BACKGROUND: Most patients with depression are managed in general practice. In deprived areas, depression is more common and poorer outcomes have been reported. AIM: To compare general practice consultations and early outcomes for patients with depression living in areas of high or low socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary data analysis of a prospective observational study involving 25 GPs and 356 consultations in deprived areas, and 20 GPs and 303 consultations in more affluent areas, with follow-up at 1 month. METHOD: Validated measures were used to (a) objectively assess the patient centredness of consultations, and (b) record patient perceptions of GP empathy. RESULTS: PHQ-9 scores >10 (suggestive of caseness for moderate to severe depression) were significantly more common in deprived than in affluent areas (30.1% versus 18.5%, P<0.001). Patients with depression in deprived areas had more multimorbidity (65.4% versus 48.2%, P<0.05). Perceived GP empathy and observer-rated patient-centred communication were significantly lower in consultations in deprived areas. Outcomes at 1 month were significantly worse (persistent caseness 71.4% deprived, 43.2% affluent, P = 0.01). After multilevel multiregression modelling, observer-rated patient centredness in the consultation was predictive of improvement in PHQ-9 score in both affluent and deprived areas. CONCLUSION: In deprived areas, patients with depression are more common and early outcomes are poorer compared with affluent areas. Patient-centred consulting appears to improve early outcome but may be difficult to achieve in deprived areas because of the inverse care law and the burden of multimorbidity.
BACKGROUND: Most patients with depression are managed in general practice. In deprived areas, depression is more common and poorer outcomes have been reported. AIM: To compare general practice consultations and early outcomes for patients with depression living in areas of high or low socioeconomic deprivation. DESIGN AND SETTING: Secondary data analysis of a prospective observational study involving 25 GPs and 356 consultations in deprived areas, and 20 GPs and 303 consultations in more affluent areas, with follow-up at 1 month. METHOD: Validated measures were used to (a) objectively assess the patient centredness of consultations, and (b) record patient perceptions of GP empathy. RESULTS: PHQ-9 scores >10 (suggestive of caseness for moderate to severe depression) were significantly more common in deprived than in affluent areas (30.1% versus 18.5%, P<0.001). Patients with depression in deprived areas had more multimorbidity (65.4% versus 48.2%, P<0.05). Perceived GP empathy and observer-rated patient-centred communication were significantly lower in consultations in deprived areas. Outcomes at 1 month were significantly worse (persistent caseness 71.4% deprived, 43.2% affluent, P = 0.01). After multilevel multiregression modelling, observer-rated patient centredness in the consultation was predictive of improvement in PHQ-9 score in both affluent and deprived areas. CONCLUSION: In deprived areas, patients with depression are more common and early outcomes are poorer compared with affluent areas. Patient-centred consulting appears to improve early outcome but may be difficult to achieve in deprived areas because of the inverse care law and the burden of multimorbidity.
Authors: Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-06
Authors: Kevin Fiscella; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks; Cleveland G Shields; Paul Duberstein; Susan H McDaniel; Ronald M Epstein Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jane M Gunn; Gail P Gilchrist; Patty Chondros; Melina Ramp; Kelsey L Hegarty; Grant A Blashki; Dimity C Pond; Mike Kyrios; Helen E Herrman Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2008-06-16 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Stewart W Mercer; Yuefang Zhou; Gerry M Humphris; Alex McConnachie; Andisheh Bakhshi; Annemieke Bikker; Maria Higgins; Paul Little; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Graham C M Watt Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Isabel Goicolea; Anna-Karin Hurtig; Miguel San Sebastian; Carmen Vives-Cases; Bruno Marchal Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Gary McLean; Jane Gunn; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie; Graham C M Watt; David N Blane; Stewart W Mercer Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Stewart William Mercer; Rosaleen O'Brien; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Maria Higgins; Bruce Guthrie; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke Journal: Chronic Illn Date: 2016-04-10