Stewart W Mercer1, Yuefang Zhou2, Gerry M Humphris2, Alex McConnachie3, Andisheh Bakhshi3, Annemieke Bikker4, Maria Higgins4, Paul Little5, Bridie Fitzpatrick4, Graham C M Watt4. 1. Academic Unit of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Well-being, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom sm83z@clinmed.gla.ac.uk. 2. School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom. 3. Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. 4. Academic Unit of General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Well-being, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. 5. Primary Medical Care, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor close, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The influence of multimorbidity on the clinical encounter is poorly understood, especially in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation where burdensome multimorbidity is concentrated. The aim of the current study was to examine the effect of multimorbidity on general practice consultations, in areas of high and low deprivation. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses of 659 video-recorded routine consultations involving 25 general practitioners (GPs) in deprived areas and 22 in affluent areas of Scotland. Patients rated the GP's empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure immediately after the consultation. Videos were analyzed using the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication. Multilevel, multi-regression analysis identified differences between the groups. RESULTS: In affluent areas, patients with multimorbidity received longer consultations than patients without multimorbidity (mean 12.8 minutes vs 9.3, respectively; P = .015), but this was not so in deprived areas (mean 9.9 minutes vs 10.0 respectively; P = .774). In affluent areas, patients with multimorbidity perceived their GP as more empathic (P = .009) than patients without multimorbidity; this difference was not found in deprived areas (P = .344). Video analysis showed that GPs in affluent areas were more attentive to the disease and illness experience in patients with multimorbidity (P < .031) compared with patients without multimorbidity. This was not the case in deprived areas (P = .727). CONCLUSIONS: In deprived areas, the greater need of patients with multimorbidity is not reflected in the longer consultation length, higher GP patient centeredness, and higher perceived GP empathy found in affluent areas. Action is required to redress this mismatch of need and service provision for patients with multimorbidity if health inequalities are to be narrowed rather than widened by primary care.
PURPOSE: The influence of multimorbidity on the clinical encounter is poorly understood, especially in areas of high socioeconomic deprivation where burdensome multimorbidity is concentrated. The aim of the current study was to examine the effect of multimorbidity on general practice consultations, in areas of high and low deprivation. METHODS: We conducted secondary analyses of 659 video-recorded routine consultations involving 25 general practitioners (GPs) in deprived areas and 22 in affluent areas of Scotland. Patients rated the GP's empathy using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure immediately after the consultation. Videos were analyzed using the Measure of Patient-Centered Communication. Multilevel, multi-regression analysis identified differences between the groups. RESULTS: In affluent areas, patients with multimorbidity received longer consultations than patients without multimorbidity (mean 12.8 minutes vs 9.3, respectively; P = .015), but this was not so in deprived areas (mean 9.9 minutes vs 10.0 respectively; P = .774). In affluent areas, patients with multimorbidity perceived their GP as more empathic (P = .009) than patients without multimorbidity; this difference was not found in deprived areas (P = .344). Video analysis showed that GPs in affluent areas were more attentive to the disease and illness experience in patients with multimorbidity (P < .031) compared with patients without multimorbidity. This was not the case in deprived areas (P = .727). CONCLUSIONS: In deprived areas, the greater need of patients with multimorbidity is not reflected in the longer consultation length, higher GP patient centeredness, and higher perceived GP empathy found in affluent areas. Action is required to redress this mismatch of need and service provision for patients with multimorbidity if health inequalities are to be narrowed rather than widened by primary care.
Authors: Bhautesh Jani; Annemieke P Bikker; Maria Higgins; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Paul Little; Graham C M Watt; Stewart W Mercer Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Karen Barnett; Stewart W Mercer; Michael Norbury; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Stewart W Mercer; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Glen Gourlay; Gaby Vojt; Alex McConnachie; Graham C M Watt Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Stewart W Mercer; Bhautesh D Jani; Margaret Maxwell; Samuel Y S Wong; Graham C M Watt Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2012-02-08 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Stewart W Mercer; Bridie Fitzpatrick; Bruce Guthrie; Elisabeth Fenwick; Eleanor Grieve; Kenny Lawson; Nicki Boyer; Alex McConnachie; Suzanne M Lloyd; Rosaleen O'Brien; Graham C M Watt; Sally Wyke Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-06-22 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Håvard T Rydland; Erlend L Fjær; Terje A Eikemo; Tim Huijts; Clare Bambra; Claus Wendt; Ivana Kulhánová; Pekka Martikainen; Chris Dibben; Ramunė Kalėdienė; Carme Borrell; Mall Leinsalu; Matthias Bopp; Johan P Mackenbach Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ana Carolina Reis Tadeu; Inês Rosendo Carvalho E Silva Caetano; Inês Jorge de Figueiredo; Luiz Miguel Santiago Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Benita A Bamgbade; Saket R Sanghai; David D McManus; Darleen Lessard; Molly E Waring; Sarah Forrester; Isabelle Pierre-Louis; Jane S Saczynski Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Amal R Khanolkar; Nishi Chaturvedi; Valerie Kuan; Daniel Davis; Alun Hughes; Marcus Richards; David Bann; Praveetha Patalay Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Markku Satokangas; Martti Arffman; Harri Antikainen; Alastair H Leyland; Ilmo Keskimäki Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 3.178