Wolfgang Lutz1, Niklaus Stulz, Katharina Köck. 1. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, University of Trier, D-54286 Trier, Germany. wolfgang.lutz@uni-trier.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While highlighting the efficacy of different treatments for major depressive disorders (MDD), findings of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program (TDCRP) often are interpreted as supporting the idea of treatment non-specificity for MDD. However, heterogeneity in treatment courses and outcomes might be undetected when focusing only on types of treatment in terms of sample means without taking into account early change in treatment. METHOD: In this study, growth mixture models (GMM) were used in the completer sample of N=162 patients from theNIMH TDCRP to identify meaningful patterns of early change of depression severity that are shared by many individual patients. RESULTS: Results revealed three typical patterns of early change over the first 8 weeks of treatment irrespective of the type of treatment protocol provided: (a) moderate to severe depression with moderate early improvement, (b) moderate to severe depression with rapid early improvement, and (c) mild to moderate depression with moderate early improvement. In contrast to the type of treatment, these differential patterns of early response (together with overall pre-treatment symptom severity) predicted outcomes (i.e. depression severity) at treatment termination and over the 1.5-year follow-up period. LIMITATIONS: Due to the small sample size and the controlled setting of this study the degree to which these results can be generalized to clinical practice has to be further investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide further support for the assumption that early change is an important factor for the prediction of short- and long-term outcome in psychotherapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: While highlighting the efficacy of different treatments for major depressive disorders (MDD), findings of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program (TDCRP) often are interpreted as supporting the idea of treatment non-specificity for MDD. However, heterogeneity in treatment courses and outcomes might be undetected when focusing only on types of treatment in terms of sample means without taking into account early change in treatment. METHOD: In this study, growth mixture models (GMM) were used in the completer sample of N=162 patients from the NIMH TDCRP to identify meaningful patterns of early change of depression severity that are shared by many individual patients. RESULTS: Results revealed three typical patterns of early change over the first 8 weeks of treatment irrespective of the type of treatment protocol provided: (a) moderate to severe depression with moderate early improvement, (b) moderate to severe depression with rapid early improvement, and (c) mild to moderate depression with moderate early improvement. In contrast to the type of treatment, these differential patterns of early response (together with overall pre-treatment symptom severity) predicted outcomes (i.e. depression severity) at treatment termination and over the 1.5-year follow-up period. LIMITATIONS: Due to the small sample size and the controlled setting of this study the degree to which these results can be generalized to clinical practice has to be further investigated. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide further support for the assumption that early change is an important factor for the prediction of short- and long-term outcome in psychotherapy.
Authors: Wolfgang Lutz; Stefan G Hofmann; Julian Rubel; James F Boswell; M Katherine Shear; Jack M Gorman; Scott W Woods; David H Barlow Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2014-01-20
Authors: Thomas C Baghai; Pierre Blier; David S Baldwin; Michael Bauer; Guy M Goodwin; Kostas N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Brian E Leonard; Ulrik F Malt; Dan Stein; Marcio Versiani; Hans-Jürgen Möller Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Gregory E Simon; Victoria Ding; Rebecca Hubbard; Paul Fishman; Evette Ludman; Leo Morales; Belinda Operskalski; James Savarino Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2012-11
Authors: Andrea Bradford; Jeffrey Cully; Howard Rhoades; Mark Kunik; Cynthia Kraus-Schuman; Nancy Wilson; Melinda Stanley Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Tessa Katherine Mooney; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Robert Gallop; Rachel A Mack; Paul Crits-Christoph Journal: Psychother Res Date: 2013-11-13
Authors: Niklaus Stulz; Robert Gallop; Wolfgang Lutz; Glenda L Wrenn; Paul Crits-Christoph Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 4.492