Literature DB >> 22865796

Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.

Le Kang1, Chengjie Xiong, Paul Crane, Lili Tian.   

Abstract

Many researchers have addressed the problem of finding the optimal linear combination of biomarkers to maximize the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for scenarios with binary disease status. In practice, many disease processes such as Alzheimer can be naturally classified into three diagnostic categories such as normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and for such diseases the volume under the ROC surface (VUS) is the most commonly used index of diagnostic accuracy. In this article, we propose a few parametric and nonparametric approaches to address the problem of finding the optimal linear combination to maximize the VUS. We carried out simulation studies to investigate the performance of the proposed methods. We apply all of the investigated approaches to a real data set from a cohort study in early stage AD.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865796      PMCID: PMC4351049          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

Review 1.  Emerging molecular markers of cancer.

Authors:  David Sidransky
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Combining diagnostic test results to increase accuracy.

Authors:  M S Pepe; M L Thompson
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; John C Morris
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The meaning and use of the volume under a three-class ROC surface (VUS).

Authors:  Xin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  On the statistical analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  M L Thompson; W Zucchini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A min-max combination of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Chunling Liu; Aiyi Liu; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; Yan Yan; Feng Gao; Kai Yu; John C Morris
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.207

9.  Combining biomarkers to detect disease with application to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Charles Kooperberg; Margaret Pepe; Robert Smith; Peter H Gann
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  The Optimal Linear Combination of Multiple Predictors Under the Generalized Linear Models.

Authors:  Hua Jin; Ying Lu
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 0.870

View more
  7 in total

1.  Combining multiple biomarkers linearly to maximize the partial area under the ROC curve.

Authors:  Qingxiang Yan; Leonidas E Bantis; Janet L Stanford; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Exact p-values for Simon's two-stage designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Hua Zhang; Tao Jiang; Hanna Peterson; Daniel Young; Changxing Ma
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2016-06-16

3.  Estimating the optimal linear combination of predictors using spherically constrained optimization.

Authors:  Priyam Das; Debsurya De; Raju Maiti; Mona Kamal; Katherine A Hutcheson; Clifton D Fuller; Bibhas Chakraborty; Christine B Peterson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Linear combination methods to improve diagnostic/prognostic accuracy on future observations.

Authors:  Le Kang; Aiyi Liu; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Combining large number of weak biomarkers based on AUC.

Authors:  Li Yan; Lili Tian; Song Liu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Semiparametric isotonic regression analysis for risk assessment under nested case-control and case-cohort designs.

Authors:  Wen Li; Ruosha Li; Ziding Feng; Jing Ning
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-12-22       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  A combination of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the GRACE risk score better predicts PCI outcomes in Chinese Han patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Dong Zhou; Zhaofei Wan; Yan Fan; Juan Zhou; Zuyi Yuan
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.596

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.