Literature DB >> 17763377

A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Chengjie Xiong1, Gerald van Belle, J Philip Miller, Yan Yan, Feng Gao, Kai Yu, John C Morris.   

Abstract

Many medical diagnostic studies involve three ordinal diagnostic groups in which the diagnostic accuracy can be summarized by the volume or partial volume under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) surface. We study in this paper the statistical comparison of diagnostic accuracy from multiple diagnostic tests when three ordinal diagnostic groups are involved. Under the assumption that the multiple diagnostic tests follow a multivariate normal distribution within each diagnostic group, we provide the asymptotic variance and covariance for the maximum likelihood estimates of the volumes under the ROC surfaces from multiple diagnostic tests and propose statistical tests to test whether the diagnostic accuracy as measured by the volume under the ROC surface is the same for multiple diagnostic tests. We also propose a confidence interval estimate to the difference of two volumes under two ROC surfaces. Our approach depends crucially on the assumptions of normal distributions on diagnostic tests, which might not be robust when such assumptions are violated. Finally, we apply our proposed methodology to a real data set of 118 subjects to compare the diagnostic accuracy of early stage Alzheimer's disease (AD) from multiple neuropsychological tests. ((c) 2007 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17763377     DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200610359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biom J        ISSN: 0323-3847            Impact factor:   2.207


  9 in total

1.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A regression approach to ROC surface, with applications to Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jialiang Li; Andrew Xiaohua Zhou; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Sci China Math       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.331

3.  Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Exact confidence interval estimation for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong; Chin-Ying Lai; Albert Vexler
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 1.111

5.  DiagTest3Grp: An R Package for Analyzing Diagnostic Tests with Three Ordinal Groups.

Authors:  Jingqin Luo; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Confidence interval estimation of the difference between two sensitivities to the early disease stage.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Le Kang; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 2.207

7.  Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Paul Crane; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Jingqin Luo; Folasade Agboola; Elizabeth Grant; John C Morris
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.494

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.