Literature DB >> 18450532

The meaning and use of the volume under a three-class ROC surface (VUS).

Xin He1, Eric C Frey.   

Abstract

Previously, we have proposed a method for three-class receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on decision theory. In this method, the volume under a three-class ROC surface (VUS) serves as a figure-of-merit (FOM) and measures three-class task performance. The proposed three-class ROC analysis method was demonstrated to be optimal under decision theory according to several decision criteria. Further, an optimal three-class linear observer was proposed to simultaneously maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) between the test statistics of each pair of the classes provided certain data linearity condition. Applicability of this three-class ROC analysis method would be further enhanced by the development of an intuitive meaning of the VUS and a more general method to calculate the VUS that provides an estimate of its standard error. In this paper, we investigated the general meaning and usage of VUS as a FOM for three-class classification task performance. We showed that the VUS value, which is obtained from a rating procedure, equals the percent correct in a corresponding categorization procedure for continuous rating data. The significance of this relationship goes beyond providing another theoretical basis for three-class ROC analysis-it enables statistical analysis of the VUS value. Based on this relationship, we developed and tested algorithms for calculating the VUS and its variance. Finally, we reviewed the current status of the proposed three-class ROC analysis methodology, and concluded that it extends and unifies decision theoretic, linear discriminant analysis, and psychophysical foundations of binary ROC analysis in a three-class paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450532      PMCID: PMC2654215          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2007.908687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  20 in total

1.  Comparing three-class diagnostic tests by three-way ROC analysis.

Authors:  S Dreiseitl; L Ohno-Machado; M Binder
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  The hypervolume under the ROC hypersurface of "near-guessing" and "near-perfect" observers in N-class classification tasks.

Authors:  Darrin C Edwards; Charles E Metz; Robert M Nishikawa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Restrictions on the three-class ideal observer's decision boundary lines.

Authors:  Darrin C Edwards; Charles E Metz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Three-class ROC analysis--a decision theoretic approach under the ideal observer framework.

Authors:  Xin He; Charles E Metz; Benjamin M W Tsui; Jonathan M Links; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Three-way ROCs.

Authors:  D Mossman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Multiple-Event Forced-Choice Tasks in the Theory of Signal Detectability

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Three-class ROC analysis--the equal error utility assumption and the optimality of three-class ROC surface using the ideal observer.

Authors:  Xin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  On the statistical analysis of ROC curves.

Authors:  M L Thompson; W Zucchini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The validity of three-class Hotelling trace (3-HT) in describing three-class task performance: comparison of three-class volume under ROC surface (VUS) and 3-HT.

Authors:  Xin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems.

Authors:  Nicholas Petrick; Berkman Sahiner; Samuel G Armato; Alberto Bert; Loredana Correale; Silvia Delsanto; Matthew T Freedman; David Fryd; David Gur; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Zhimin Huo; Yulei Jiang; Lia Morra; Sophie Paquerault; Vikas Raykar; Frank Samuelson; Ronald M Summers; Georgia Tourassi; Hiroyuki Yoshida; Bin Zheng; Chuan Zhou; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Three-class ROC analysis--toward a general decision theoretic solution.

Authors:  Xin He; Brandon D Gallas; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.051

4.  Optimization and comparison of simultaneous and separate acquisition protocols for dual isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Michael Ghaly; Jonathan M Links; Eric C Frey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Application of three-class ROC analysis to task-based image quality assessment of simultaneous dual-isotope myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS).

Authors:  Xin He; Xiyun Song; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  The validity of three-class Hotelling trace (3-HT) in describing three-class task performance: comparison of three-class volume under ROC surface (VUS) and 3-HT.

Authors:  Xin He; Eric C Frey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Paul Crane; Lili Tian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Diagnostic thresholds with three ordinal groups.

Authors:  Kristopher Attwood; Lili Tian; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  Evaluate the performance of four artificial intelligence-aided diagnostic systems in identifying and measuring four types of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Ming-Yue Wu; Yong Li; Bin-Jie Fu; Guo-Shu Wang; Zhi-Gang Chu; Dan Deng
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Can subjective pain be inferred from objective physiological data? Evidence from patients with sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Mark J Panaggio; Daniel M Abrams; Fan Yang; Tanvi Banerjee; Nirmish R Shah
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.475

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.