Literature DB >> 1491257

Influence of temporal cues on acoustic motion-direction sensitivity of auditory neurons in the owl.

H Wagner1, T Takahashi.   

Abstract

1. We studied the sensitivity of auditory neurons in the barn owl's brain stem to the direction of apparent acoustic motion. Motion stimuli were generated with an array of seven free-field speakers (Fig. 2). Motion-direction sensitivity was determined by comparing the number of spikes evoked by counterclockwise (CCW) motion with the number of spikes evoked by clockwise (CW) motion. A directionality index (DI) was defined to quantify the measurements. The statistical significance of the directional bias was determined by a chi 2 test that used the responses to stationary sounds as the null hypothesis. 2. During the search for acoustic neurons, dichotic stimuli were presented via earphones, and the sensitivity of the units for interaural time difference (ITD), interaural level difference (ILD), and frequency was measured. After a unit had been isolated, its response to moving and stationary free-field stimuli was recorded. Most of the neurons that responded to dichotic stimulation responded also to free-field stimulation. At 61 of the 211 recording sites, the response was motion-direction sensitive. 3. The spontaneous activity of all neurons was low, so that some 95% of the recorded activity was due to an excitation caused by the stimuli. 4. Neurons sensitive to the direction of motion were found in many nuclei of the auditory pathway such as the nuclei of the lateral lemniscus, the subnuclei of the inferior colliculus (IC), and the optic tectum (OT) (Figs. 3 and 5-8, Table 1). 5. In 61% of the motion-direction-sensitive neurons, the response to motion in the preferred direction was equal to the response to stationary sounds, whereas in 75% of the neurons, the response to motion in the null direction was lower than the response to stationary sounds (Table 2, Fig. 6). This observation suggested a null-direction inhibition as one important factor of generating motion-direction sensitivity. 6. Neurons having a high motion-direction sensitivity usually responded phasically, whereas tonically active neurons exhibited a low motion-direction sensitivity (Fig. 9). 7. Velocity tuning was broad (Fig. 7). A shallow peak appeared around 310 degrees/s within the range tested (125-1,200 degrees/s, 33 cells). 8. A silent gap between the bursts from successive speakers caused a decrease in motion-direction sensitivity. This decrease was linear with gap duration and depended on the apparent velocity (Figs. 10-13).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1491257     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.6.2063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  14 in total

1.  Auditory space-time receptive field dynamics revealed by spherical white-noise analysis.

Authors:  R L Jenison; J W Schnupp; R A Reale; J F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Context-dependent adaptive coding of interaural phase disparity in the auditory cortex of awake macaques.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Brian H Scott; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Responses of cat primary auditory cortex neurons to moving stimuli with dynamically changing interaural delays.

Authors:  N I Nikitin; A L Varfolomeev; L M Kotelenko
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-11

4.  Direction selectivity mediated by adaptation in the owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Role of synaptic inhibition in processing of dynamic binaural level stimuli.

Authors:  D H Sanes; B J Malone; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neural coding and perception of auditory motion direction based on interaural time differences.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Stimulus-specific adaptation to visual but not auditory motion direction in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  Dante F Wasmuht; Jose L Pena; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Spatial tuning of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the big brown bat: effects of sound level, stimulus type and multiple sound sources.

Authors:  B Grothe; E Covey; J H Casseday
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Responses to simulated echoes by neurons in the barn owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  C H Keller; T T Takahashi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.