Literature DB >> 22850925

Using prediction errors to drive saccade adaptation: the implicit double-step task.

Aaron L Wong1, Mark Shelhamer.   

Abstract

A prediction-based error signal, neurally computed as the difference between predicted and observed movement outcomes, has been proposed as the driving force for motor learning. This suggests that the generation of predictive saccades to periodically paced targets-whose performance accuracy is actively maintained using this same error signal-invokes the motor-learning network. We examined whether a simple predictive-saccade task (implicit double-step adaptation, in which targets are gradually displaced outward to exaggerate normal hypometric movement errors) can stand in place of a traditional double-step saccade-adaptation task to induce an increase in saccade gain. We find that the implicit double-step adaptation task can induce significant gain-increase adaptation (of comparable magnitude to that of the standard double-step task) in normal control subjects. Unlike control subjects, patients with impaired cerebella are unable to adapt their saccades in response to this paradigm; this implies that the cerebellum is crucial for processing prediction-based error signals for motor learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22850925      PMCID: PMC3443328          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3195-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking.

Authors:  Susanne M Morton; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching.

Authors:  Ya-Weng Tseng; Jörn Diedrichsen; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Disturbance of predictive response initiation of eye and head movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M Nagel; H Behrmann; W H Zangemeister
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 1.710

6.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Sensorimotor adaptation error signals are derived from realistic predictions of movement outcomes.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neuropathological and molecular studies of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6).

Authors:  H Sasaki; H Kojima; I Yabe; K Tashiro; T Hamada; H Sawa; H Hiraga; K Nagashima
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 17.088

9.  Cerebellar contributions to adaptive control of saccades in humans.

Authors:  Minnan Xu-Wilson; Haiyin Chen-Harris; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Reduced saccadic resilience and impaired saccadic adaptation due to cerebellar disease.

Authors:  Heidrun Golla; Konstantin Tziridis; Thomas Haarmeier; Nicolas Catz; Shabtai Barash; Peter Thier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  8 in total

1.  Multiple timescales in the adaptation of the rotational VOR.

Authors:  Paolo Colagiorgio; Giovanni Bertolini; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Stefano Ramat
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Similarities in error processing establish a link between saccade prediction at baseline and adaptation performance.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Impairment of saccade adaptation in a patient with a focal thalamic lesion.

Authors:  E Zimmermann; F Ostendorf; C J Ploner; M Lappe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Age-related effects of increasing postural challenge on eye movement onset latencies to visual targets.

Authors:  Sergio Jimenez; Mark Hollands; Stephen Palmisano; Juno Kim; Maria Markoulli; Darryl McAndrew; Alexander Stamenkovic; Joel Walsh; Sophie Bos; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Visual Space Constructed by Saccade Motor Maps.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Oculomotor Adaptation Elicited By Intra-Saccadic Visual Stimulation: Time-Course of Efficient Visual Target Perturbation.

Authors:  Muriel T N Panouillères; Valerie Gaveau; Jeremy Debatisse; Patricia Jacquin; Marie LeBlond; Denis Pélisson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Saccade Adaptation and Visual Uncertainty.

Authors:  David Souto; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.