Literature DB >> 25744882

Multiple timescales in the adaptation of the rotational VOR.

Paolo Colagiorgio1, Giovanni Bertolini2, Christopher J Bockisch3, Dominik Straumann4, Stefano Ramat5.   

Abstract

Goal-directed movements, such as pointing and saccades, have been shown to share similar neural architectures, in spite of the different neuromuscular systems producing them. Such structure involve an inverse model of the actuator being controlled, which produces the commands innervating the muscles, and a forward model of the actuator, which predicts the sensory consequences of such commands and allows online movement corrections. Recent studies have shown that goal-directed movements also share similar motor-learning and motor-memory mechanisms, which are based on multiple timescales. The hypothesis that also the rotational vestibulo-ocular reflex (rVOR) may be based on a similar architecture has been presented recently. We hypothesize that multiple timescales are the brain's solution to the plasticity-stability dilemma, allowing adaptation to temporary and sudden changes while keeping stable motor-control abilities. If that were the case, then we would also expect the adaptation of reflex movements to follow the same principles. Thus we studied rVOR gain adaptation in eight healthy human subjects using a custom paradigm aimed at investigating the existence of spontaneous recovery, which we considered as the hallmark of multiple timescales in motor learning. Our experimental results show that spontaneous recovery occurred in six of eight subjects. Thus we developed a mathematical model of rVOR adaptation based on two hidden-states processes, which adapts the cerebellar-forward model of the ocular motor plant, and show that it accurately simulates our experimental data on rVOR gain adaptation, whereas a single timescale learning process fails to do so.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VOR adaptation; VOR adaptation model; internal models; motor learning; multiple timescales

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25744882      PMCID: PMC4455561          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00688.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  65 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Adaptation of the human vestibuloocular reflex to magnifying lenses.

Authors:  G M Gauthier; D A Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-07-11       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Authors:  Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm?

Authors:  JoAnn Kluzik; Jörn Diedrichsen; Reza Shadmehr; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural correlates of forward and inverse models for eye movements: evidence from three-dimensional kinematics.

Authors:  Fatema F Ghasia; Hui Meng; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Adaptive filters and internal models: multilevel description of cerebellar function.

Authors:  John Porrill; Paul Dean; Sean R Anderson
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2012-12-28

9.  Using prediction errors to drive saccade adaptation: the implicit double-step task.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A New Tool for Investigating the Functional Testing of the VOR.

Authors:  Paolo Colagiorgio; Silvia Colnaghi; Maurizio Versino; Stefano Ramat
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.003

View more
  7 in total

1.  Trial-to-trial adaptation in control of arm reaching and standing posture.

Authors:  Alison Pienciak-Siewert; Dylan P Horan; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Estimating properties of the fast and slow adaptive processes during sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Multiple Time Courses of Vestibular Set-Point Adaptation Revealed by Sustained Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Labyrinth.

Authors:  Prem Jareonsettasin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Moving in a Moving World: A Review on Vestibular Motion Sickness.

Authors:  Giovanni Bertolini; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Dynamics of contrast adaptation in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Michael A Webster; Fang Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Kenji Ogawa; Jinchi Lv; Nicolas Schweighofer; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Head impulse compensatory saccades: Visual dependence is most evident in bilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Jacob M Pogson; Rachael L Taylor; Leigh A McGarvie; Andrew P Bradshaw; Mario D'Souza; Sean Flanagan; Jonathan Kong; G Michael Halmagyi; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.