Literature DB >> 26838356

Age-related effects of increasing postural challenge on eye movement onset latencies to visual targets.

Sergio Jimenez1, Mark Hollands2, Stephen Palmisano3, Juno Kim4, Maria Markoulli4, Darryl McAndrew1, Alexander Stamenkovic1, Joel Walsh1, Sophie Bos1, Paul J Stapley5.   

Abstract

When a single light cue is given in the visual field, our eyes orient towards it with an average latency of 200 ms. If a second cue is presented at or around the time of the response to the first, a secondary eye movement occurs that represents a reorientation to the new target. While studies have shown that eye movement latencies to 'single-step' targets may or may not be lengthened with age, secondary eye movements (during 'double-step' displacements) are significantly delayed with increasing age. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the postural challenge posed simply by standing (as opposed to sitting) results in significantly longer eye movement latencies in older adults compared to the young. Ten young (<35 years) and 10 older healthy adults (>65 years) participated in the study. They were required to fixate upon a central target and move their eyes in response to 2 types of stimuli: (1) a single-step perturbation of target position either 15° to the right or left and (2) a double-step target displacement incorporating an initial target jump to the right or left by 15°, followed after 200 ms, by a shift of target position to the opposite side (e.g. +15° then -15°). All target displacement conditions were executed in sit and stand positions with the participant at the same distance from the targets. Eye movements were recorded using electro-oculography. Older adults did not show significantly longer eye movement latencies than the younger adults for single-step target displacements, and postural configuration (stand compared to sit) had no effect upon latencies for either group. We categorised double-step trials into those during which the second light changed after or before the onset of the eye shift to the first light. For the former category, young participants showed faster secondary eye shifts to the second light in the standing position, while the older adults did not. For the latter category of double-step trial, young participants showed no significant difference between sit and stand secondary eye movement latencies, but older adults were significantly longer standing compared to sitting. The older adults were significantly longer than the younger adults across both postural conditions, regardless of when the second light change occurred during the eye shift to the first light. We suggest that older adults require greater time and perhaps attentional processes to execute eye movements to unexpected changes in target position when faced with the need to maintain standing balance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Balance; Electro-oculography; Gaze; Target perturbations

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26838356     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4564-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search.

Authors:  R M McPeek; A A Skavenski; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Postural orientation: age-related changes in variability and time-to-boundary.

Authors:  E E H van Wegen; R E A van Emmerik; G E Riccio
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.161

3.  Contributions of altered sensation and feedback responses to changes in coordination of postural control due to aging.

Authors:  R A Speers; A D Kuo; F B Horak
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Automatic online control of motor adjustments in reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Valérie Gaveau; Laure Pisella; Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Takao Fukui; Yves Rossetti; Denis Pélisson; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Goal anticipation during action observation is influenced by synonymous action capabilities, a puzzling developmental study.

Authors:  Gustaf Gredebäck; Olga Kochukhova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Postural configuration does not alter unperturbed or perturbed reach movement kinematics.

Authors:  Silvia Hua; Julia A Leonard; Alicia J Hilderley; Paul J Stapley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optomotor and neuropsychological performance in old age.

Authors:  C Klein; B Fischer; K Hartnegg; W H Heiss; M Roth
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Differing effects of prosaccades and antisaccades on postural stability.

Authors:  Agathe Legrand; Karine Doré Mazars; Julie Lazzareschi; Christelle Lemoine; Isabelle Olivier; Julien Barra; Maria Pia Bucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Using prediction errors to drive saccade adaptation: the implicit double-step task.

Authors:  Aaron L Wong; Mark Shelhamer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are age-related deficits in route learning related to control of visual attention?

Authors:  Christopher Hilton; Sebastien Miellet; Timothy J Slattery; Jan Wiener
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.