Literature DB >> 18353917

Spontaneous recovery of motor memory during saccade adaptation.

Vincent Ethier1, David S Zee, Reza Shadmehr.   

Abstract

It is possible that motor adaptation in timescales of minutes is supported by two distinct processes: one process that learns slowly from error but has strong retention, and another that learns rapidly from error but has poor retention. This two-state model makes the prediction that if a period of adaptation is followed by a period of reverse-adaptation, then in the subsequent period in which errors are clamped to zero (error-clamp trials) there will be a spontaneous recovery, i.e., a rebound of behavior toward the initial level of adaptation. Here we tested and confirmed this prediction during double-step, on-axis, saccade adaptation. When people adapted their saccadic gain to a magnitude other than one (adaptation) and then the gain was rapidly reversed back to one (reverse-adaptation), in the subsequent error-clamp trials (visual target placed on the fovea after the saccade) the gain reverted toward the initially adapted value and then gradually reverted toward normal. We estimated that the fast system was about 20-fold more sensitive to error than the slow system, but had a time constant of 28 s, whereas the slow system had a time constant of nearly 8 min. Therefore short-term adaptive mechanisms that maintain accuracy of saccades rely on a memory system that has characteristics of a multistate process with a logarithmic distribution of timescales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18353917      PMCID: PMC2733835          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00015.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  21 in total

1.  Saccadic dysmetria and adaptation after lesions of the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  S Barash; A Melikyan; A Sivakov; M Zhang; M Glickstein; P Thier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.

Authors:  R A Scheidt; D J Reinkensmeyer; M A Conditt; W Z Rymer; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Temporal characteristics of error signals driving saccadic gain adaptation in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  J L Shafer; C T Noto; A F Fuchs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A mechanism for savings in the cerebellum.

Authors:  J F Medina; K S Garcia; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cerebellar influences on saccade plasticity.

Authors:  F R Robinson; A F Fuchs; C T Noto
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Behavioral and neural analysis of extinction.

Authors:  Karyn M Myers; Michael Davis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Memory of learning facilitates saccadic adaptation in the monkey.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Yoshiki Iwamoto; Kaoru Yoshida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Adaptive control of saccades via internal feedback.

Authors:  Haiyin Chen-Harris; Wilsaan M Joiner; Vincent Ethier; David S Zee; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual error is the stimulus for saccade gain adaptation.

Authors:  C T Noto; F R Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-10

10.  Non-visual information does not drive saccade gain adaptation in monkeys.

Authors:  Teri Seeberger; Christopher Noto; Farrel Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  67 in total

1.  The relative importance of retinal error and prediction in saccadic adaptation.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contributions of the motor cortex to adaptive control of reaching depend on the perturbation schedule.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Learning on multiple timescales in smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Protection and expression of human motor memories.

Authors:  Sarah E Pekny; Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration.

Authors:  Ritsuko Hanajima; Reza Shadmehr; Shinya Ohminami; Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Yuichiro Shirota; Takahiro Shimizu; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Yasuo Terao; Shoji Tsuji; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Motoaki Uchimura; Masato Inoue; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Persistence of motor memories reflects statistics of the learning event.

Authors:  Vincent S Huang; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A shared resource between declarative memory and motor memory.

Authors:  Aysha Keisler; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Impaired Motor Learning in a Disorder of the Inferior Olive: Is the Cerebellum Confused?

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Aaron L Wong; Lance M Optican; David S Zee
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Consolidation patterns of human motor memory.

Authors:  Sarah E Criscimagna-Hemminger; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Saccade and vestibular ocular motor adaptation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; David S Zee
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.