Literature DB >> 22847575

Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Masanori Tokunaga1, Junya Kondo, Yutaka Tanizawa, Etsuro Bando, Taiichi Kawamura, Masanori Terashima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) has been increasingly used for the treatment of early gastric cancer, and many advantages over open gastrectomy (OG) have been reported. However, only a few reports have assessed postoperative complications following LAG using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
METHODS: A total of 265 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy or pylorus-preserving gastrectomy with D1+ lymph node dissection for clinical stage IA early gastric cancer at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between June 2009 and December 2011 were included in this study. Clinicopathological characteristics and early surgical outcomes were compared between patients who underwent LAG (LAG group, n = 129) and those who underwent OG (OG group, n = 136). The severity of postoperative morbidities was assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.
RESULTS: There were no differences in sex or age between the two groups. Body mass index (21.97 vs. 23.19, P < 0.001) was lower in the LAG group than the OG group. The duration of the postoperative hospital stay was similar between the two groups (9 days each, P = 0.511). There was no difference in the overall morbidity rate (grade II or higher) between the two groups (LAG group, 7.0%; OG group, 8.1%; P = 0.818). The incidence of grade IIIa or more severe morbidities was also not significantly different between the LAG group (4.7%) and OG group (2.9%, P = 0.532).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in postoperative complication rates between the LAG and the OG groups. The more severe Clavien-Dindo grade III complications, which required surgical interventions, were observed at similar rates between the two groups. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is therefore feasible in terms of the incidence and severity of intra-abdominal complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22847575     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1981-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

1.  Effect of obesity on laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hirochika Makino; Chikara Kunisaki; Yusuke Izumisawa; Motohiko Tokuhisa; Takashi Oshima; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Jun Kimura; Ryo Takagawa; Takashi Kosaka; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: a collective review with meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Michitaka Fujiwara; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Satoshi Morita; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Increased fat content and body shape have little effect on the accuracy of lymph node retrieval and blood loss in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Ogura; Satoshi Miyata; Masanori Tokunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Hiroshi Okabe; Hisahiro Hosogi; Eiji Tanaka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Comparison of respiratory function recovery in the early phase after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hideki Kawamura; Ryoichi Yokota; Shigenori Homma; Yukifumi Kondo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to open distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jae-Hong Han; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Yun-Suhk Suh; Dong-Seok Han; Seong-Ho Kong; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Comparison of long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Joo-Ho Lee; Cha-Kyong Yom; Ho-Seong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: is it beneficial for patients of heavier weight?

Authors:  Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Shimizu; Eishi Nagai; Kenoki Ohuchida; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Kei Sato; Mayumi Kawamata; Amane Kanazawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Clavien-Dindo classification and risk factors of gastrectomy-related complications: an analysis of 1049 patients.

Authors:  Hua Xiao; Pingli Xie; Kunyan Zhou; Xiaoxin Qiu; Yuan Hong; Jingshi Liu; Yongzhong Ouyang; Tang Ming; Hailong Xie; Xiaohong Wang; Haizhen Zhu; Man Xia; Chaohui Zuo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  Comparison of the short-term efficacy of sequential treatment with intravesical single-port laparoscopic partial cystectomy with bladder preservation or open partial cystectomy in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hai-Xing Mai; Jun-LE Liu; Shu-Jun Pei; L I Zhao; Nan Qu; Jin-Kai Dong; Biao Chen; Ya-Lin Wang; Cheng Huang; Li-Jun Chen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial.

Authors:  Seungho Lee; Jin Kyong Kim; Youn Nam Kim; Dong-Su Jang; Yoo Min Kim; Taeil Son; Woo Jin Hyung; Hyoung-Il Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rie Makuuchi; Tomoyuki Irino; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Early phase II study of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Norihiko Sugisawa; Junya Kondo; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for middle-third advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhengyan Li; Gang Ji; Bin Bai; Deliang Yu; Yezhou Liu; Bo Lian; Qingchuan Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Lymph Node Retrieval is Inferior in the Modified Merendino Resection for Early Barrett's Carcinoma: A Matched-Pair Comparison with Ivor Lewis Resection.

Authors:  Thomas Haist; Markus Mann; Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski; Michael Pauthner; Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff; Dietmar Lorenz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open extended (D2) lymph node dissection for distal gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Zhao; Oh Jeong; Mi Ran Jung; Seong Yeop Ryu; Young Kyu Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.