BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) is increasingly performed in Japan and Korea and is thought to have many advantages over laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, a prospective study investigating the safety of RADG has never been reported. The present study evaluated the safety of RADG with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective phase II study included patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer located within the lower two-thirds of the stomach. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal infectious complications including anastomotic leakage, pancreas-related infection, and intraabdominal abscess. The secondary endpoints included all in-hospital adverse events, RADG completion rate, and survival outcome. RESULTS: From May 2012 to November 2012, 18 eligible patients were enrolled for this study. The incidence of intraabdominal infectious complication was 0 % (90 % CI, 0-12.0 %). The overall incidence of in-hospital adverse events was 22.2 % (90 % CI, 8.0-43.9 %). No patient required conversion to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy; thus, the RADG completion rate was 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: This early phase II study suggested that RADG might be a safe and feasible procedure for stage IA gastric cancer, providing experienced surgeons perform the surgery. This conclusion should be clarified in subsequent late phase II studies with a larger sample size.
BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) is increasingly performed in Japan and Korea and is thought to have many advantages over laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, a prospective study investigating the safety of RADG has never been reported. The present study evaluated the safety of RADG with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA gastric cancer. METHODS: This single-center, prospective phase II study included patients with clinical stage IA gastric cancer located within the lower two-thirds of the stomach. The primary endpoint was the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal infectious complications including anastomotic leakage, pancreas-related infection, and intraabdominal abscess. The secondary endpoints included all in-hospital adverse events, RADG completion rate, and survival outcome. RESULTS: From May 2012 to November 2012, 18 eligible patients were enrolled for this study. The incidence of intraabdominal infectious complication was 0 % (90 % CI, 0-12.0 %). The overall incidence of in-hospital adverse events was 22.2 % (90 % CI, 8.0-43.9 %). No patient required conversion to laparoscopic or open gastrectomy; thus, the RADG completion rate was 100 %. CONCLUSIONS: This early phase II study suggested that RADG might be a safe and feasible procedure for stage IA gastric cancer, providing experienced surgeons perform the surgery. This conclusion should be clarified in subsequent late phase II studies with a larger sample size.
Authors: Y Kakeji; K Konishi; S Ieiri; T Yasunaga; M Nakamoto; K Tanoue; H Baba; Y Maehara; M Hashizume Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: R Pugliese; D Maggioni; F Sansonna; G C Ferrari; A Forgione; A Costanzi; C Magistro; J Pauna; S Di Lernia; D Citterio; C Brambilla Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2008-03-14 Impact factor: 4.424