Literature DB >> 28550435

Lymph Node Retrieval is Inferior in the Modified Merendino Resection for Early Barrett's Carcinoma: A Matched-Pair Comparison with Ivor Lewis Resection.

Thomas Haist1, Markus Mann1, Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski2, Michael Pauthner1, Annette Fisseler-Eckhoff3, Dietmar Lorenz4.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: A matched-pair comparison between the modified Merendino resection (MER) and Ivor Lewis resection (ILR) for early Barrett's carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: Early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (eACE) with positive risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) needs surgery for cure. MER appeared to be an alternative to ILR.
METHODS: Between July 2000 and July 2012, 156 patients with high-grade dysplasia or eACE received ILR, whereas in 30 cases MER was performed in a tertiary care center for GI Surgery. A matched-pair analysis was performed on the basis of sex, age, BMI, ASA classification and tumor stage. Thirty patients were assigned to each group. The data were analyzed regarding perioperative aspects (e.g., operating time, hospital stay, complications, number of lymph nodes) and survival analysis.
RESULTS: The mean operating time was 301.7 min for ILR, compared to 255.4 min for MER (p = 0.044). The hospital stay following ILR was significantly longer than for MER (22.4 days ILR vs. 16.4 days MER, p = 0.023). There was no statistically significant difference regarding complications between the two groups (p = 0.463). The number of resected lymph nodes was significantly lower in the MER group (median 21) compared to the ILR group, where a median of 31 lymph nodes could be removed (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall (p = 0.145) or tumor-specific survival (p = 0.353).
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node retrieval is significantly inferior in the MER. Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two operating techniques, although the operation time for ILR took longer and these patients required a longer hospital stay. MER should not be applied in cases with high risk of LNM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550435     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4061-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  30 in total

1.  Do we still need EUS in the workup of patients with early esophageal neoplasia? A retrospective analysis of 131 cases.

Authors:  Roos E Pouw; Noor Heldoorn; Lorenza Alvarez Herrero; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Mike Visser; Olivier R Busch; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Bas L Weusten; Paul Fockens; Jacques J Bergman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Postoperative mortality following oesophagectomy and problems in reporting its rate.

Authors:  G G Jamieson; G Mathew; R Ludemann; J Wayman; J C Myers; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Prognostic relevance of skip metastases in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Klaus L Prenzel; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Wolfgang Schröder; Stefan P Mönig; Uta Drebber; Daniel Vallboehmer; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Risk factors for complications after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  Pernilla Viklund; Mats Lindblad; Ming Lu; Weimin Ye; Jan Johansson; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cancer statistics, 2005.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Elizabeth Ward; Alicia Samuels; Ram C Tiwari; Asma Ghafoor; Eric J Feuer; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  H J Stein; M Feith; J Mueller; M Werner; J R Siewert
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy.

Authors:  B Zane Atkins; Ashish S Shah; Kelley A Hutcheson; Jennifer H Mangum; Theodore N Pappas; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after radical resection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Qing-Guo Li; Ping Li; Dong Tang; Jie Chen; Dao-Rong Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Esophagectomies with thoracic incisions carry increased pulmonary morbidity.

Authors:  Neil H Bhayani; Aditya Gupta; Christy M Dunst; Ashwin A Kurian; Kevin M Reavis; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer, 11th Edition: part I.

Authors: 
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.230

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Surgical strategy for early stage carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  N Niclauss; M Chevallay; J L Frossard; S P Mönig
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Endoscopic and surgical treatment of early gastric and esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  T Haist; M Knabe; A May; D Lorenz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.