Literature DB >> 21654172

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy compared to open distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer.

Jae-Hong Han1, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Yun-Suhk Suh, Dong-Seok Han, Seong-Ho Kong, Han-Kwang Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in early gastric cancer (EGC) with special interest in a learning curve effect.
METHODS: The clinical outcomes of EGC patients who underwent LADG (n = 100) and sex-, age- and body mass index- (BMI) matched EGC patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG; n = 100) were compared retrospectively. In addition, the outcomes between the early (n = 50) and late LADG group (n = 50) were compared.
RESULTS: The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was significantly smaller in the LADG group than in the ODG group (29.3 vs. 36.4, p < 0.001). The operative time of the LADG group was significantly longer than in the ODG group (249.1 vs. 152.9 min, p < 0.001). The complication rates were comparable between both groups (14 vs. 13%, p = 0.84). No cancer-related death was observed in either group. Between early and late LADG groups, the operative time was shorter (p < 0.001) and the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (p = 0.016) in the late group.
CONCLUSIONS: LADG seems to be a safe and feasible procedure in treating EGC, as it shows comparable outcomes with ODG. The potential disadvantages of LADG, such as longer operation time and smaller number of retrieved lymph nodes, diminished after overcoming the learning curve.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21654172     DOI: 10.1159/000328658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  7 in total

Review 1.  A comparison of surgical procedures and postoperative cares for minimally invasive laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong-Na Tang; Jun-Hong Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.

Authors:  Seung-Young Oh; Sebastianus Kwon; Kyung-Goo Lee; Yun-Suhk Suh; Hwi-Nyeong Choe; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Woo Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Case-matched comparison of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Ke Chen; Xiao-Wu Xu; Yu Pan; Yi-Ping Mou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Qiuye Cheng; Tony C Y Pang; Michael J Hollands; Arthur J Richardson; Henry Pleass; Emma S Johnston; Vincent W T Lam
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Postoperative intra-abdominal complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following open and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Junya Kondo; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  First experiences with laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy: in the view of comparison with high volume centers.

Authors:  Ye Seob Jee
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-08-27

7.  A safe anastomotic technique of using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for proximal malignant tumors of the stomach.

Authors:  Jian-Wei Xie; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Lu Jun
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.754

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.