| Literature DB >> 22839690 |
Zulane Lima Sousa1, Fernando Faustino de Oliveira, Aline Oliveira da Conceição, Luiz Alberto Mattos Silva, Maria Helena Rossi, Juliana da Silva Santos, João Luciano Andrioli.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chenopodium ambrosioides and Kielmeyera neglecta are plants traditionally used in Brazil to treat various infectious diseases. The study of the biological activities of these plants is of great importance for the detection of biologically active compounds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22839690 PMCID: PMC3475072 DOI: 10.1186/1476-0711-11-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Bioactivity of extracts of and against
| | | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hex | 2699.8 | 1050.8 | |
| | DCM | - * | 1379.2 |
| | EtOAc | 1324.8 | 780.8 |
| | EtOH | 2154.5 | 977.7 |
| Hex | - # | - # | |
| | DCM | 1371.2 | 359.9 |
| | EtOAc | - * | 1444.4 |
| EtOH | 1059.0 | 356.6 | |
Hex, hexane; DCM, dichloromethane; EtOAc, ethyl acetate; EtOH, ethanol. * No deaths enough for statistical analysis; # High mortality, invalidating the statistical test.
Figure 1Mortality of to extracts of (KN) and (CA); Hex, hexane; DCM, dichloromethane; EtOAc, ethyl acetate.
Antimicrobial activity of extracts of and
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −/− | −/− | −/− | -/12.5 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | -/12.5 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| -/12.5 | −/− | -/12.5 | -/12.5 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | -/12.5 | -/12.5 | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | -/300 | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | −/− | −/− | -/50 | -/300 | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | -/300 | −/− | -/50 | −/− | −/− | −/− | |
| −/− | −/− | -/300 | −/− | -/50 | -/300 | −/− | −/− | |
| -/500 | −/− | -/200 | -/200 | 100/3.1 | -/100 | −/− | −/− | |
Hex, hexane; DCM, dichloromethane; EtOAc, ethyl acetate; EtOH, ethanol. (−) No inhibition at the concentrations tested. MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. IC 50%, inhibitory concentration of 50% growth.
Figure 2Chemical structures identified from : friedelan-3-one (A), friedelan-3-β-ol (B), β-sitosterol (C), stigmasterol (D), 1,8-dihydroxy-6,6-dimethylpyrano(2,3;5,6)-4′,4′,5′-trimethyldihydrofuran(2′,3′;2,3)xanthone (E), 1,7-dihydroxyxanthone (F). With permission of the author. (Oliveira, unpublished results).