Literature DB >> 22830742

Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Vijay Shah1, Baris Turkbey, Haresh Mani, Yuxi Pang, Thomas Pohida, Maria J Merino, Peter A Pinto, Peter L Choyke, Marcelino Bernardo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a growing need to localize prostate cancers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to facilitate the use of image guided biopsy, focal therapy, and active surveillance follow up. Our goal was to develop a decision support system (DSS) for detecting and localizing peripheral zone prostate cancers by using machine learning approach to calculate a cancer probability map from multiparametric MR images (MP-MRI).
METHODS: This IRB approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant retrospective study consisted of 31 patients (mean age and serum prostate specific antigen of 60.4 and 6.62 ng∕ml, respectively) who had MP-MRI at 3 T followed by radical prostatectomy. Seven patients were excluded due to technical issues with their MP-MRI (e.g., motion artifact, failure to perform all sequences). Cancer and normal regions were identified in the peripheral zone by correlating them to whole mount histology slides of the excised prostatectomy specimens. To facilitate the correlation, tissue blocks matching the MR slices were obtained using a MR-based patient-specific mold. Segmented regions on the MP-MRI were correlated to histopathology and used as training sets for the learning system that generated the cancer probability maps. Leave-one-patient-out cross-validation on the cancer and normal regions was performed to determine the learning system's efficacy, an evolutionary strategies approach (also known as a genetic algorithm) was used to find the optimal values for a set of parameters, and finally a cancer probability map was generated.
RESULTS: For the 24 patients that were used in the study, 225 cancer and 264 noncancerous regions were identified from the region maps. The efficacy of DSS was first determined without optimizing support vector machines (SVM) parameters, where a region having a cancer probability greater than or equal to 50% was considered as a correct classification. The nonoptimized system had an f-measure of 85% and the Kappa coefficient of 71% (Rater's agreement, where raters are DSS and ground truth histology). The efficacy of the DSS after optimizing SVM parameters using a genetic algorithm had an f-measure of 89% and a Kappa coefficient of 80%. Thus, after optimization of the DSS there was a 4% increase in the f-measure and a 9% increase in the Kappa coefficient.
CONCLUSIONS: This DSS provides a cancer probability map for peripheral zone prostate tumors based on endorectal MP-MRI. These cancer probability maps can potentially aid radiologists in accurately localizing peripheral zone prostate cancers for planning targeted biopsies, focal therapy, and follow up for active surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830742      PMCID: PMC3390048          DOI: 10.1118/1.4722753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Kenya Murase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Improved correlation of histological data with DCE MRI parameter maps by 3D reconstruction, reslicing and parameterization of the histological images.

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Martin Le-Huu; Tobias Kunert; Matthias Thorn; Silvia Vosseler; Kerstin Schmidt; Johannes Hoffend; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Norbert E Fusenig; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Processing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation of data from histopathological, molecular biological, and radiological studies: a new whole organ technique.

Authors:  S G Jhavar; C Fisher; A Jackson; S A Reinsberg; N Dennis; A Falconer; D Dearnaley; S E Edwards; S M Edwards; M O Leach; C Cummings; T Christmas; A Thompson; C Woodhouse; S Sandhu; C S Cooper; R A Eeles
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Jurgen J Fütterer; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Jeroen Veltman; Henkjan J Huisman; Pieter Vos; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; J Alfred Witjes; Paul F M Krabbe; Arend Heerschap; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Recent changes in the spatial pattern of prostate cancer in the U.S.

Authors:  Peter A Rogerson; Gaurav Sinha; Daikwon Han
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Prostate cancer detection with 3-T MRI: comparison of diffusion-weighted and T2-weighted imaging.

Authors:  Huadong Miao; Hiroshi Fukatsu; Takeo Ishigaki
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Functional MR imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Young Jun Choi; Jeong Kon Kim; Namkug Kim; Kyoung Won Kim; Eugene K Choi; Kyoung-Sik Cho
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Jeff Tanguay; Andrew J Evans; Ali-Tahir Hashmi; Gina Lockwood; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  DCE-MRI biomarkers in the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents.

Authors:  J P B O'Connor; A Jackson; G J M Parker; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  [Multiparametric imaging with simultaneous MRI/PET: Methodological aspects and possible clinical applications].

Authors:  S Gatidis; H Schmidt; C D Claussen; N F Schwenzer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with MRI.

Authors:  Baowei Fei
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  [Multiparametric imaging with simultaneous MR/PET. Methodological aspects and possible clinical applications].

Authors:  S Gatidis; H Schmidt; C D Claussen; N F Schwenzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Computer-aided analysis of prostate multiparametric MR images: an unsupervised fusion-based approach.

Authors:  N Betrouni; N Makni; S Lakroum; S Mordon; A Villers; P Puech
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Automated prostate cancer detection using T2-weighted and high-b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto; Shijun Wang; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Imaging modalities in focal therapy: patient selection, treatment guidance, and follow-up.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Willemien van den Bos; Peter A Pinto; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Imaging-Based Algorithm for the Local Grading of Glioma.

Authors:  E D H Gates; J S Lin; J S Weinberg; S S Prabhu; J Hamilton; J D Hazle; G N Fuller; V Baladandayuthapani; D T Fuentes; D Schellingerhout
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Detection of Prostate Cancer: Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed Using Registered Correlative Histopathology.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Chaitanya Kalavagunta; Benjamin Spilseth; Patrick J Bolan; Xiufeng Li; Diane Hutter; Jung W Nam; Andrew D Johnson; Jonathan C Henriksen; Laura Moench; Badrinath Konety; Christopher A Warlick; Stephen C Schmechel; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.