Literature DB >> 32029466

Imaging-Based Algorithm for the Local Grading of Glioma.

E D H Gates1,2, J S Lin1,3,4, J S Weinberg1, S S Prabhu1, J Hamilton5, J D Hazle1, G N Fuller1, V Baladandayuthapani6, D T Fuentes1, D Schellingerhout7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Gliomas are highly heterogeneous tumors, and optimal treatment depends on identifying and locating the highest grade disease present. Imaging techniques for doing so are generally not validated against the histopathologic criterion standard. The purpose of this work was to estimate the local glioma grade using a machine learning model trained on preoperative image data and spatially specific tumor samples. The value of imaging in patients with brain tumor can be enhanced if pathologic data can be estimated from imaging input using predictive models.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with gliomas were enrolled in a prospective clinical imaging trial between 2013 and 2016. MR imaging was performed with anatomic, diffusion, permeability, and perfusion sequences, followed by image-guided stereotactic biopsy before resection. An imaging description was developed for each biopsy, and multiclass machine learning models were built to predict the World Health Organization grade. Models were assessed on classification accuracy, Cohen κ, precision, and recall.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (with 7/9/7 grade II/III/IV gliomas) had analyzable imaging-pathologic pairs, yielding 52 biopsy sites. The random forest method was the best algorithm tested. Tumor grade was predicted at 96% accuracy (κ = 0.93) using 4 inputs (T2, ADC, CBV, and transfer constant from dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging). By means of the conventional imaging only, the overall accuracy decreased (89% overall, κ = 0.79) and 43% of high-grade samples were misclassified as lower-grade disease.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that local pathologic grade can be predicted with a high accuracy using clinical imaging data. Advanced imaging data improved this accuracy, adding value to conventional imaging. Confirmatory imaging trials are justified.
© 2020 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32029466      PMCID: PMC7077885          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  31 in total

1.  VarioGuide: a new frameless image-guided stereotactic system--accuracy study and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Florian Ringel; Dominik Ingerl; Stephanie Ott; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Molecular and cellular heterogeneity: the hallmark of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Diane J Aum; David H Kim; Thomas L Beaumont; Eric C Leuthardt; Gavin P Dunn; Albert H Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Guiding the first biopsy in glioma patients using estimated Ki-67 maps derived from MRI: conventional versus advanced imaging.

Authors:  Evan D H Gates; Jonathan S Lin; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Jackson Hamilton; Sujit S Prabhu; John D Hazle; Gregory N Fuller; Veera Baladandayuthapani; David Fuentes; Dawid Schellingerhout
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Glioma grade assessment by using histogram analysis of diffusion tensor imaging-derived maps.

Authors:  András Jakab; Péter Molnár; Miklós Emri; Ervin Berényi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma: don't forget the peritumoral brain zone.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Lemée; Anne Clavreul; Philippe Menei
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Spatial discrimination of glioblastoma and treatment effect with histologically-validated perfusion and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging metrics.

Authors:  Melissa A Prah; Mona M Al-Gizawiy; Wade M Mueller; Elizabeth J Cochran; Raymond G Hoffmann; Jennifer M Connelly; Kathleen M Schmainda
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Robust atrophy rate measurement in Alzheimer's disease using multi-site serial MRI: tissue-specific intensity normalization and parameter selection.

Authors:  Kelvin K Leung; Matthew J Clarkson; Jonathan W Bartlett; Shona Clegg; Clifford R Jack; Michael W Weiner; Nick C Fox; Sébastien Ourselin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Residual Convolutional Neural Network for the Determination of IDH Status in Low- and High-Grade Gliomas from MR Imaging.

Authors:  Ken Chang; Harrison X Bai; Hao Zhou; Chang Su; Wenya Linda Bi; Ena Agbodza; Vasileios K Kavouridis; Joeky T Senders; Alessandro Boaro; Andrew Beers; Biqi Zhang; Alexandra Capellini; Weihua Liao; Qin Shen; Xuejun Li; Bo Xiao; Jane Cryan; Shakti Ramkissoon; Lori Ramkissoon; Keith Ligon; Patrick Y Wen; Ranjit S Bindra; John Woo; Omar Arnaout; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Paul J Zhang; Bruce R Rosen; Li Yang; Raymond Y Huang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 13.801

10.  Multi-Parametric MRI and Texture Analysis to Visualize Spatial Histologic Heterogeneity and Tumor Extent in Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Leland S Hu; Shuluo Ning; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Nathan Gaw; Amylou C Dueck; Kris A Smith; Peter Nakaji; Jonathan Plasencia; Sara Ranjbar; Stephen J Price; Nhan Tran; Joseph Loftus; Robert Jenkins; Brian P O'Neill; William Elmquist; Leslie C Baxter; Fei Gao; David Frakes; John P Karis; Christine Zwart; Kristin R Swanson; Jann Sarkaria; Teresa Wu; J Ross Mitchell; Jing Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in neuro-oncology: toward novel development fields.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Nunno; Mario Fordellone; Giuseppe Minniti; Sofia Asioli; Alfredo Conti; Diego Mazzatenta; Damiano Balestrini; Paolo Chiodini; Raffaele Agati; Caterina Tonon; Alicia Tosoni; Lidia Gatto; Stefania Bartolini; Raffaele Lodi; Enrico Franceschi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.506

2.  Multimodal MRI Analysis of Cervical Cancer on the Basis of Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Yuanyuan Zhang; Chunyan Wu; Fen Wang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Diagnosis and Nursing Intervention of Gynecological Ovarian Endometriosis with Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.

Authors:  Nijie Jiang; Hong Xie; Jiao Lin; Yun Wang; Yanan Yin
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-11

4.  Estimating Local Cellular Density in Glioma Using MR Imaging Data.

Authors:  E D H Gates; J S Weinberg; S S Prabhu; J S Lin; J Hamilton; J D Hazle; G N Fuller; V Baladandayuthapani; D T Fuentes; D Schellingerhout
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for the Classification of Molecular Features of Gliomas on MRI: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Evi J van Kempen; Max Post; Manoj Mannil; Benno Kusters; Mark Ter Laan; Frederick J A Meijer; Dylan J H A Henssen
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.