AIMS: To develop a method of processing non-formalin fixed prostate specimens removed at radical prostatectomy to obtain fresh tissue for research and for correlating diagnostic and molecular results with preoperative imaging. METHODS/ RESULTS: The method involves a prostate slicing apparatus comprising a tissue slicer with a series of juxtaposed planar stainless steel blades linked to a support, and a cradle adapted to grip the tissue sample and receive the blades. The fresh prostate gland is held in the cradle and the blades are moved through the cradle slits to produce multiple 4 mm slices of the gland in a plane perpendicular to its posterior surface. One of the resulting slices is preserved in RNAlater. The areas comprising tumour and normal glands within this preserved slice can be identified by matching it to the haematoxylin and eosin stained sections of the adjacent slices that are formalin fixed and paraffin wax embedded. Intact RNA can be extracted from the identified tumour and normal glands within the RNAlater preserved slice. Preoperative imaging studies are acquired with the angulation of axial images chosen to be similar to the slicing axis, such that stained sections from the formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded slices match their counterparts on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: A novel method of sampling fresh prostate removed at radical prostatectomy that allows tissue samples to be used both for diagnosis and molecular analysis is described. This method also allows the integration of preoperative imaging data with histopathological and molecular data obtained from the prostate tissue slices.
AIMS: To develop a method of processing non-formalin fixed prostate specimens removed at radical prostatectomy to obtain fresh tissue for research and for correlating diagnostic and molecular results with preoperative imaging. METHODS/ RESULTS: The method involves a prostate slicing apparatus comprising a tissue slicer with a series of juxtaposed planar stainless steel blades linked to a support, and a cradle adapted to grip the tissue sample and receive the blades. The fresh prostate gland is held in the cradle and the blades are moved through the cradle slits to produce multiple 4 mm slices of the gland in a plane perpendicular to its posterior surface. One of the resulting slices is preserved in RNAlater. The areas comprising tumour and normal glands within this preserved slice can be identified by matching it to the haematoxylin and eosin stained sections of the adjacent slices that are formalin fixed and paraffin wax embedded. Intact RNA can be extracted from the identified tumour and normal glands within the RNAlater preserved slice. Preoperative imaging studies are acquired with the angulation of axial images chosen to be similar to the slicing axis, such that stained sections from the formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded slices match their counterparts on imaging. CONCLUSIONS: A novel method of sampling fresh prostate removed at radical prostatectomy that allows tissue samples to be used both for diagnosis and molecular analysis is described. This method also allows the integration of preoperative imaging data with histopathological and molecular data obtained from the prostate tissue slices.
Authors: S R Florell; C M Coffin; J A Holden; J W Zimmermann; J W Gerwels; B K Summers; D A Jones; S A Leachman Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Y J Lu; D Williamson; J Clark; R Wang; N Tiffin; L Skelton; T Gordon; R Williams; B Allan; A Jackman; C Cooper; K Pritchard-Jones; J Shipley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-07-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Vijay Shah; Thomas Pohida; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Li Hong Chen; Henry Ho; Richie Lazaro; Choon Hua Thng; John Yuen; Wan Sing Ng; Chris Cheng Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Hari Trivedi; Baris Turkbey; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Compton J Benjamin; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Vijay Shah; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; W Marston Linehan; Aradhana M Venkatesan; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto Journal: Urology Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Raquel Esgueva; Kyung Park; Robert Kim; Naoki Kitabayashi; Christopher E Barbieri; Philip J Dorsey; Cyril Abraham; Samprit Banerjee; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari; Stéphane Terry; Maria M Shevchuk; David S Rickman; Mark A Rubin Journal: Diagn Mol Pathol Date: 2012-06
Authors: Vijay Shah; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Yuxi Pang; Thomas Pohida; Maria J Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo Journal: Med Phys Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: B G Muller; A Swaan; D M de Bruin; W van den Bos; A W Schreurs; D J Faber; E C H Zwartkruis; L Rozendaal; A N Vis; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; R J A van Moorselaar; T G van Leeuwen; J J M C H de la Rosette Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-07-07
Authors: Sameer Jhavar; Alison Reid; Jeremy Clark; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Timothy Christmas; Alan Thompson; Christopher Woodhouse; Christopher Ogden; Cyril Fisher; Cathy Corbishley; Johann De-Bono; Rosalind Eeles; Daniel Brewer; Colin Cooper Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2007-12-28 Impact factor: 5.568