Literature DB >> 26691512

Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses in Breast DCE-MRI.

Emi Honda1,2, Ryohei Nakayama3, Hitoshi Koyama4, Akiyoshi Yamashita4.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to develop a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme for distinguishing between benign and malignant breast masses in dynamic contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Our database consisted 90 DCE-MRI examinations, each of which contained four sequential phase images; this database included 28 benign masses and 62 malignant masses. In our CAD scheme, we first determined 11 objective features of masses by taking into account the image features and the dynamic changes in signal intensity that experienced radiologists commonly use for describing masses in DCE-MRI. Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) was employed to distinguish between benign and malignant masses. As the input of the QDA, a combination of four objective features was determined among the 11 objective features according to a stepwise method. These objective features were as follows: (i) the change in signal intensity from 2 to 5 min; (ii) the change in signal intensity from 0 to 2 min; (iii) the irregularity of the shape; and (iv) the smoothness of the margin. Using this approach, the classification accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were shown to be 85.6 % (77 of 90), 87.1 % (54 of 62), and 82.1 % (23 of 28), respectively. Furthermore, the positive and negative predictive values were 91.5 % (54 of 59) and 74.2 % (23 of 31), respectively. Our CAD scheme therefore exhibits high classification accuracy and is useful in the differential diagnosis of masses in DCE-MRI images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; DCE-MRI; Mass

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26691512      PMCID: PMC4879039          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9856-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  Accuracy of MR imaging in the work-up of suspicious breast lesions: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Hrung; S S Sonnad; J S Schwartz; C P Langlotz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  S Agliozzo; M De Luca; C Bracco; A Vignati; V Giannini; L Martincich; L A Carbonaro; A Bert; F Sardanelli; D Regge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Nicky H G M Peters; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Willem P T M Mali; Karel G M Moons; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Feature selection in computer-aided breast cancer diagnosis via dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Megan Rakoczy; Donald McGaughey; Michael J Korenberg; Jacob Levman; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Hans Messersmith; Petrina Causer; Andrea Eisen; Rene Shumak; Donald Plewes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Qian Yang; Lihua Li; Juan Zhang; Guoliang Shao; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging.

Authors:  K G Gilhuijs; M L Giger; U Bick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon.

Authors:  Garima Agrawal; Min-Ying Su; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preliminary results of computer-aided diagnosis for magnetic resonance imaging of solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Qiujie Yu; Kuan Huang; Ye Zhu; Xiaodan Chen; Wei Meng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Study on automatic detection and classification of breast nodule using deep convolutional neural network system.

Authors:  Feiqian Wang; Xiaotong Liu; Na Yuan; Buyue Qian; Litao Ruan; Changchang Yin; Ciping Jin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme for Distinguishing Between Benign and Malignant Masses on Breast DCE-MRI Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network with Bayesian Optimization.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Hizukuri; Ryohei Nakayama; Mayumi Nara; Megumi Suzuki; Kiyoshi Namba
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Computer-Aided Diagnosis Evaluation of the Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Meng; Yunfeng Sun; Haibin Qian; Xiaodan Chen; Qiujie Yu; Nanding Abiyasi; Shaolei Yan; Haiyong Peng; Hongxia Zhang; Xiushi Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.