Literature DB >> 22822221

Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

David Hamilton1, G Robin Henderson, Paul Gaston, Deborah MacDonald, Colin Howie, A Hamish R W Simpson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The comparative outcome of primary hip and knee arthroplasty is not well understood. This study aimed to investigate the outcome and satisfaction of these procedures and determine predictive models for 1 year patient outcome with a view to informing surgical management and patient expectations. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of all primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures performed at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh between January 2006 and November 2008. General health (SF-12) and joint specific function (Oxford Score) was assessed pre-operatively and at 6 and 12 months post-operatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed at 12 months.
RESULTS: 1410 total hip arthroplasty (THA) and 1244 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures were assessed. Oxford Score improved by 4.9 points more in THA patients than in TKA patients. SF-12 physical scores were on average 2.7 points greater in the THA patients at one year. Satisfaction was also greater (91%) following THA compared with TKA (81%). Regression modelling was not able to predict individual patient outcome; however, mean pre-operative Oxford Scores were found to be strong predictors of mean post-operative Oxford Scores for each procedure. Age, gender and pre-operative general health scores did not influence these models.
CONCLUSIONS: Both THA and TKA confer substantial improvement in patient outcome; however, greater joint specific, general health and satisfaction scores are reported following THA. This difference is physical in nature. Regression models are presented that can be applied to predict mean hip/knee arthroplasty outcome based on preoperative values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22822221     DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  29 in total

1.  No decline in high patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  P P Schmitz; J L C van Susante; A Hol; R Brokelman; C J M van Loon
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-01

2.  Clinical improvement and satisfaction after total joint replacement: a prospective 12-month evaluation on the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Ulrich Lenze; Vanessa Wellauer; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Course of pain after total hip arthroplasty within a standardized pain management concept: a prospective study examining influence, correlation, and outcome of postoperative pain on 103 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Felix Greimel; Gregor Dittrich; Timo Schwarz; Moritz Kaiser; Bernd Krieg; Florian Zeman; Joachim Grifka; Achim Benditz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Characterizing patients' expectations in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Frederique J Hafkamp; Paul Lodder; Jolanda de Vries; Taco Gosens; Brenda L den Oudsten
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients' satisfaction.

Authors:  Christoph Schnurr; Maike Jarrous; Isabell Güdden; Peer Eysel; Dietmar Pierre König
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Evaluation of the Multi-Attribute Prioritisation Tool for Total Joint Replacement.

Authors:  Michael Nganga; Donald Bramwell; Jenifer Monaghan; Christine Doerr; Graham Mercer; Jeganath Krishnan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: a lack of divergent validity.

Authors:  Johannes M Giesinger; Markus S Kuster; Henrik Behrend; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement.

Authors:  D F Hamilton; J V Lane; P Gaston; J T Patton; D Macdonald; A H R W Simpson; C R Howie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Muscle 'regenerative potential' determinesphysical recovery following total knee replacement.

Authors:  D F Hamilton; J A McLeish; P Gaston; A H R W Simpson
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Higher body mass index is associated with larger postoperative improvement in patient-reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Giesinger; J M Giesinger; D F Hamilton; J Rechsteiner; A Ladurner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.