Literature DB >> 29657477

Evaluation of the Multi-Attribute Prioritisation Tool for Total Joint Replacement.

Michael Nganga1,2, Donald Bramwell1,2, Jenifer Monaghan3, Christine Doerr3, Graham Mercer1,3, Jeganath Krishnan1,2,4.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The demand for arthroplasty is increasing and will continue to rise with an ageing population. Obesity and lengthy waiting time for Total Joint Replacement (TJR) have been associated with poorer outcomes postoperatively. This study aimed to evaluate the Multi-Attribute Prioritisation Tool (MAPT) for TJR patients. The primary objective was to explore if patients prioritised by the MAPT had an improvement in score post-operative. Further to identify any relationship between MAPT score and length of time on the waiting list or obesity.
METHOD: This retrospective cohort study included 308 patients undergoing total hip (n = 114) or total knee (n = 194) arthroplasty. We examined preoperative and postoperative MAPT scores of patients who had total hip or total knee arthroplasty. After assessing the difference between postoperative and preoperative MAPT scores, patients scores were compared to BMI and waiting time classes. BMI was allocated to less than 30, 30-35, 35-40 and greater than 40. Duration of time on the waiting list was allocated to less than 6 months and greater than 6 months.
RESULTS: THA and TKA patients MAPT scores improved from a preoperative score of 71.39-5.26 postoperative and 54.11 to 7.13 respectively. Patients whose MAPT scores placed them in the high priority category had a significant relationship with length of time on the waiting list (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between length of time on the waiting list and improvement scores for low priority and middle priority patients. BMI had minimal effect on patients improvement score postoperative.
CONCLUSION: TJR patients prioritised by the MAPT questionnaire do experience pain relief as portrayed by a reduction in postoperative MAPT score. A longer length of time on the waiting list seems to effect the improvement a high priority patient can have postoperative.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multi-attribute prioritisation tool; Total hip replacement; Total knee replacement

Year:  2018        PMID: 29657477      PMCID: PMC5895892          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  10 in total

Review 1.  Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue.

Authors:  Andrea J Curtis; Colin O H Russell; Johannes U Stoelwinder; John J McNeil
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Hamilton; G Robin Henderson; Paul Gaston; Deborah MacDonald; Colin Howie; A Hamish R W Simpson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Correlation of MAPT scores with clinical and radiographic assessment of patients awaiting THR/TKR.

Authors:  Vikram Mohan David; George Bousounis; Theo Kapakoulakis; Robert Champion; Kevin Masman; Keith McCullough
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Associations between preoperative functional status and functional outcomes of total joint replacement in the Dominican Republic.

Authors:  Kyle E Dempsey; Jamie E Collins; Roya Ghazinouri; Luis Alcantara; Thomas S Thornhill; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 7.580

5.  Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status.

Authors:  M Ostendorf; H F van Stel; E Buskens; A J P Schrijvers; L N Marting; A J Verbout; W J A Dhert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

Review 6.  The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review.

Authors:  Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Elvire Servien; Warren Dunn; Diane Dahm; Jos A M Bramer; Daniel Haverkamp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Implementation of a quality care management system for patients with arthritis of the hip and knee.

Authors:  Christine R Doerr; Stephen E Graves; Graham E Mercer; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  Aust Health Rev       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.990

Review 8.  The Influence of Obesity on the Outcome of TKR: Can the Impact of Obesity be justified from the Viewpoint of the Overall Health Care System?

Authors:  E Carlos Rodriguez-Merchan
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-04-05

Review 9.  The utility of outcome measures in total knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Michelle M Dowsey; Peter F M Choong
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-10-31

10.  Patient-reported quality of life after primary major joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zoe H Dailiana; Ippolyti Papakostidou; Sokratis Varitimidis; Lycurgos Liaropoulos; Elias Zintzaras; Theofilos Karachalios; Emmanuel Michelinakis; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Clinical efficacy of orthopilot navigation system versus conventional manual of total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianguo Jia; Qun Zhao; Pei Lu; Guiyong Fan; Hao Chen; Chaoqun Liu; Jinlian Liu; Sheng Chen; Zhengshuai Jin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.