Literature DB >> 29858665

No decline in high patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty at long-term follow-up.

P P Schmitz1, J L C van Susante1, A Hol1, R Brokelman2, C J M van Loon3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction is gaining popularity as an important outcome parameter in today's healthcare system and in particular in evaluating the outcome of joint arthroplasty. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful procedure with reports on high patient satisfaction at short-term follow-up. Commonly used clinical outcome parameters remain good at long-term follow-up; however, whether this also accounts for patient satisfaction remains unclear. This study presents a prospective follow-up of patient satisfaction after THA, and a possible correlation with common outcome parameters was established.
METHODS: This study entails a concise follow-up of an earlier study on patient satisfaction 2.5 years after THA. Patient satisfaction was repeatedly measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) after a mean follow-up of 13.5 (12.6-14.2) years in a prospective cohort of 147 patients (153 THAs). In addition, VAS pain and common clinical outcome parameters (WOMAC, OHS and SF-36) were also reassessed and were compared with short-term results after a mean follow-up of 2.5 (1.3-3.0) years.
RESULTS: At a follow-up of 13.5 (12.6-14.2) years, the median VAS for satisfaction was 95 (26-100) compared to a median VAS satisfaction of 98 (0-100) at earlier follow-up (p = 0.781). Overall, the clinical outcome parameters also remained good at long-term follow-up without significant changes. However, a rather low correlation with VAS satisfaction was encountered. Pain during activity showed the highest correlation (- 0.686) with VAS satisfaction.
CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction after THA remains high after prolonged follow-up. Apparently patients do not get used to the successful results of their THA. A rather low correlation with common clinical outcome parameters suggests that patient satisfaction is a separate entity. Since patient satisfaction correlated best with pain during activity, this is probably the most important aspect in patient satisfaction. Measurement of patient satisfaction has additional value and may even replace some of the more commonly used questionnaires.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long term; Patient satisfaction; Total hip arthroplasty; VAS

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29858665     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2243-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  22 in total

1.  Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments.

Authors:  J N Katz; M G Larson; C B Phillips; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Assessment of outcomes after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ashley W Blom
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study.

Authors:  O Rolfson; J Kärrholm; L E Dahlberg; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-07

4.  The "Oxford Heup Score": the translation and validation of a questionnaire into Dutch to evaluate the results of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Taco Gosens; Nicolette H M Hoefnagels; Riekie C W de Vet; Woliter J A Dhert; Evert J van Langelaan; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Ruud G T Geesink
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Comparative outcomes of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Hamilton; G Robin Henderson; Paul Gaston; Deborah MacDonald; Colin Howie; A Hamish R W Simpson
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty using titanium, plasma-sprayed implants: a study with 10 to 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Javier Sanz-Reig; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Isabel Llamas-Merino; Fernando Lopez-Prats
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.118

7.  Impact of active patient follow-up on worst-case 
implant survival analysis.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Callum W McBryde; Ronan B Treacy; William B Pynsent; Paul B Pynsent
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Satisfactory cross cultural equivalence of the Dutch WOMAC in patients with hip osteoarthritis waiting for arthroplasty.

Authors:  L D Roorda; C A Jones; M Waltz; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter; J W van der Eijken; W J Willems; I C Heyligers; D C Voaklander; K D Kelly; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state.

Authors:  F Tubach; P Ravaud; G Baron; B Falissard; I Logeart; N Bellamy; C Bombardier; D Felson; M Hochberg; D van der Heijde; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Roy B G Brokelman; Daniel Haverkamp; Corné van Loon; Annemiek Hol; Albert van Kampen; Rene Veth
Journal:  Eur Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-12
View more
  3 in total

1.  LIGAMENT PRESERVING TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PREVENTS DIFFERENT LEG LENGTH AND FEMORAL OFFSET.

Authors:  Masahiro Fujita; Shinya Hayashi; Tomoyuki Kamenaga; Takaaki Fujishiro; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 0.683

Review 2.  Outcome measures in total hip arthroplasty: have our metrics changed over 15 years?

Authors:  Roy H Lan; Jack W Bell; Linsen T Samuel; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Long-term patient-reported outcomes for open surgery of the triangular fibrocartilage complex.

Authors:  Reinier Feitz; Sara Khoshnaw; Mark J W van der Oest; J Sebastiaan Souer; Harm P Slijper; Steven E R Hovius; Ruud W Selles
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.