Literature DB >> 22819728

Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

B M Sheliga1, C Quaia, B G Cumming, E J Fitzgibbon.   

Abstract

Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements that can be elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. The OFR magnitude depends upon stimulus size, and also upon the spatial frequency (SF) of sine-wave gratings. Here we investigate the interaction of size and SF. We recorded initial OFRs in human subjects when 1D vertical sine-wave gratings were subject to horizontal motion. Gratings were restricted to elongated horizontal apertures-"strips"-aligned with the axis of motion. In Experiment 1 the SF and the height of a single strip was manipulated. The magnitude of the OFR increased with strip height up to some optimum value, while strip heights greater than this optimum produced smaller responses. This effect was strongly dependent on SF: the optimum strip height was smaller for higher SFs. In order to explore the underlying mechanism, Experiment 2 measured OFRs to stimuli composed of two thin horizontal strips-one in the upper visual field, the other in the lower visual field-whose vertical separation varied 32-fold. Stimuli of different sizes can be reconstructed from the sum of such horizontal strips. We found that the OFRs in Experiment 1 were smaller than the sum of the responses to the component stimuli, but greater than the average of those responses. We defined an averaging coefficient that described whether a given response was closer to the sum or to the average. For any one SF, the averaging coefficients were similar over a wide range of stimulus sizes, while they varied considerably (7-fold) for stimuli of different SFs.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819728      PMCID: PMC3430370          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  33 in total

1.  Precise recording of human eye movements.

Authors:  H Collewijn; F van der Mark; T C Jansen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceptual consequences of centre-surround antagonism in visual motion processing.

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Joseph S Lappin; Lee A Gilroy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Initial ocular following in humans: a response to first-order motion energy.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; K J Chen; E J Fitzgibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Structure and function of visual area MT.

Authors:  Richard T Born; David C Bradley
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  The vergence eye movements induced by radial optic flow: some fundamental properties of the underlying local-motion detectors.

Authors:  Y Kodaka; B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; B G Cumming; E J Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Human ocular following initiated by competing image motions: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; Y Kodaka; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Behavioral receptive field for ocular following in humans: dynamics of spatial summation and center-surround interactions.

Authors:  Frédéric V Barthélemy; Ivo Vanzetta; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Shizuka Nohara; Kenji Kawano; Kenichiro Miura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Spatial summation properties of the human ocular following response (OFR): dependence upon the spatial frequency of the stimulus.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; B G Cumming; E J Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Anisotropy in spatial summation properties of human Ocular-Following Response (OFR).

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  A behavioral receptive field for ocular following in monkeys: Spatial summation and its spatial frequency tuning.

Authors:  Frédéric V Barthélemy; Jérome Fleuriet; Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Short-latency ocular-following responses: Weighted nonlinear summation predicts the outcome of a competition between two sine wave gratings moving in opposite directions.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Human short-latency ocular vergence responses produced by interocular velocity differences.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.