Literature DB >> 24125703

Retinal visual processing constrains human ocular following response.

B M Sheliga1, C Quaia, E J FitzGibbon, B G Cumming.   

Abstract

Ocular following responses (OFRs) are the initial tracking eye movements elicited at ultra-short latency by sudden motion of a textured pattern. We wished to evaluate quantitatively the impact that subcortical stages of visual processing might have on the OFRs. In three experiments we recorded the OFRs of human subjects to brief horizontal motion of 1D vertical sine-wave gratings restricted to an elongated horizontal aperture. Gratings were composed of a variable number of abutting horizontal strips where alternate strips were in counterphase. In one of the experiments we also utilized gratings occupying a variable number of horizontal strips separated vertically by mean-luminance gaps. We modeled retinal center/surround receptive fields as a difference of two 2-D Gaussian functions. When the characteristics of such local filters were selected in accord with the known properties of primate retinal ganglion cells, a single-layer model was capable to quantitatively account for the observed changes in the OFR amplitude for stimuli composed of counterphase strips of different heights (Experiment 1), for a wide range of stimulus contrasts (Experiment 2) and spatial frequencies (Experiment 3). A similar model using oriented filters that resemble cortical simple cells was also able to account for these data. Since similar filters can be constructed from the linear summation of retinal filters, and these filters alone can explain the data, we conclude that retinal processing determines the response to these stimuli. Thus, with appropriately chosen stimuli, OFRs can be used to study visual spatial integration processes as early as in the retina. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast gain control; Retinal ganglion cells; Surround inhibition; Visual motion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24125703      PMCID: PMC3902995          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  47 in total

1.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Short-latency ocular following in humans: sensitivity to binocular disparity.

Authors:  G S Masson; C Busettini; D S Yang; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Orientation sensitivity of ganglion cells in primate retina.

Authors:  Christopher L Passaglia; John B Troy; Lukas Rüttiger; Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Receptive fields of optic nerve fibres in the spider monkey.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Ocular responses to translation and their dependence on viewing distance. II. Motion of the scene.

Authors:  C Busettini; F A Miles; U Schwarz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Receptive field dimensions of lateral geniculate cells in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  J Kremers; S Weiss
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  The neural processing of 3-D visual information: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  F A Miles
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  6 in total

1.  Difference in perceptual and oculomotor responses revealed by apparent motion stimuli presented with an interstimulus interval.

Authors:  Shizuka Nohara; Kenji Kawano; Kenichiro Miura
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A behavioral receptive field for ocular following in monkeys: Spatial summation and its spatial frequency tuning.

Authors:  Frédéric V Barthélemy; Jérome Fleuriet; Laurent U Perrinet; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Speed Estimation for Visual Tracking Emerges Dynamically from Nonlinear Frequency Interactions.

Authors:  Andrew Isaac Meso; Nikos Gekas; Pascal Mamassian; Guillaume S Masson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-05-13

4.  Ocular-following responses to white noise stimuli in humans reveal a novel nonlinearity that results from temporal sampling.

Authors:  Boris M Sheliga; Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Similar contrast sensitivity functions measured using psychophysics and optokinetic nystagmus.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; Philip R K Turnbull
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Human short-latency ocular vergence responses produced by interocular velocity differences.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.