L P Breitling1. 1. German Cancer Research Center, Division C070 Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, PO Box 101949, 69009, Heidelberg, Germany, lutz.breitling@gmail.com.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Non-linearity is a likely phenomenon in bone metabolism, but is often ignored in pertinent epidemiological studies. Using NHANES III data on calcium intake and bone mineral density, the most important non-linear methods are introduced and discussed. The results should motivate researchers to consider non-linearity in this field more frequently. INTRODUCTION: Many relationships in bone metabolism and homeostasis are likely to follow non-linear patterns. Detailed dose-response analyses allowing for non-linear associations nonetheless remain scarce in this field. METHODS: A detailed analysis of NHANES III data on dietary calcium intake and bone mineral density was used to demonstrate the application and some of the challenges of the most important dose-response methods, including LOESS, categorical analysis, fractional polynomials, restricted cubic splines, and segmented regression. RESULTS: The spline estimate suggested increasing bone mineral density up to a calcium intake of about 1 g/day and a plateau thereafter. In segmented regression, the break-point marking the beginning of the plateau was placed at an intake of 0.58 (95 % confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.82) g/day. Sensitivity analyses suggested a less curved dose-response in women. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing about the possibilities and limitations of non-linear dose-response approaches should encourage researchers to consider these methods more frequently in studies on bone health and disease. The example analysis suggested bone mineral density to reach a plateau slightly below current calcium intake recommendations, with fairly pronounced differences of the dose-response shape by sex and menopausal status.
UNLABELLED: Non-linearity is a likely phenomenon in bone metabolism, but is often ignored in pertinent epidemiological studies. Using NHANES III data on calcium intake and bone mineral density, the most important non-linear methods are introduced and discussed. The results should motivate researchers to consider non-linearity in this field more frequently. INTRODUCTION: Many relationships in bone metabolism and homeostasis are likely to follow non-linear patterns. Detailed dose-response analyses allowing for non-linear associations nonetheless remain scarce in this field. METHODS: A detailed analysis of NHANES III data on dietary calcium intake and bone mineral density was used to demonstrate the application and some of the challenges of the most important dose-response methods, including LOESS, categorical analysis, fractional polynomials, restricted cubic splines, and segmented regression. RESULTS: The spline estimate suggested increasing bone mineral density up to a calcium intake of about 1 g/day and a plateau thereafter. In segmented regression, the break-point marking the beginning of the plateau was placed at an intake of 0.58 (95 % confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.82) g/day. Sensitivity analyses suggested a less curved dose-response in women. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing about the possibilities and limitations of non-linear dose-response approaches should encourage researchers to consider these methods more frequently in studies on bone health and disease. The example analysis suggested bone mineral density to reach a plateau slightly below current calcium intake recommendations, with fairly pronounced differences of the dose-response shape by sex and menopausal status.
Authors: Elizabeth A Yetley; Christine M Pfeiffer; Rosemary L Schleicher; Karen W Phinney; David A Lacher; Sylvia Christakos; John H Eckfeldt; James C Fleet; George Howard; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Siu L Hui; Gary L Lensmeyer; Joseph Massaro; Munro Peacock; Bernard Rosner; Donald Wiebe; Regan L Bailey; Paul M Coates; Anne C Looker; Christopher Sempos; Clifford L Johnson; Mary Frances Picciano Journal: J Nutr Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Alexander M Strasak; Kilian Rapp; Larry J Brant; Wolfgang Hilbe; Martin Gregory; Willi Oberaigner; Elfriede Ruttmann; Hans Concin; Günter Diem; Karl P Pfeiffer; Hanno Ulmer Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Katie L Stone; Dana G Seeley; Li-Yung Lui; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Warren S Browner; Michael C Nevitt; Steven R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari; Douglas P Kiel; Bess Dawson-Hughes; John E Orav; Ruifeng Li; Donna Spiegelman; Thomas Dietrich; Walter C Willett Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 6.741