Literature DB >> 23761583

Breast cancer mortality trends in England and the assessment of the effectiveness of mammography screening: population-based study.

Toqir K Mukhtar1, David Rg Yeates, Michael J Goldacre.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether mortality statistics show an effect of mammographic screening on population-based breast cancer mortality in England.
DESIGN: Joinpoint regression analyses, and other analyses, of population-based mortality data.
SETTING: Analysis of mortality rates in the Oxford region, UK (1979-2009) because, unlike the rest of England, all causes of death mentioned on each death certificate for its residents (not just the underlying cause) are available prior to commencement of the English National Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). In addition, analysis of English national breast cancer mortality rates (1971-2009). PARTICIPANTS: Women who died from breast cancer in the Oxford region (1979--2009) and England (1971--2009) MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-specific mortality rates, and age-standardized mortality rates. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to estimate years ('joinpoints') in which trends changed, and annual percentage change between joinpoints, with confidence intervals.
RESULTS: In the Oxford region, trends for breast cancer mortality based on underlying cause and on mentions were very similar. For all ages combined, mortality rates peaked for both underlying cause and mentions in 1985 and then started to decline, prior to the introduction of the NHSBSP in 1988. Between 1979 and 2009, for mortality measured as underlying cause, rates declined by -2.1% (95% CI -2.7 to -1.4) per year for women aged 40-49 years (unscreened), and by the same percentage per year (-2.1% [-2.4 to -1.7]) for women aged 50-64 years (screened). In England, the first estimated changes in trend occurred prior to the introduction of screening, or before screening was likely to have had an effect (between 1982 and 1989). Thereafter, the downward trend was greatest in women aged under 40 years: -2.0% per year (-2.8 to -1.2) in 1988-2001 and -5.0% per year (-6.7 to -3.3) in 2001-2009. There was no evidence that declines in mortality rates were consistently greater in women in age groups and cohorts that had been screened at all, or screened several times, than in other (unscreened) women, in the same time periods. Conclusions Mortality statistics do not show an effect of mammographic screening on population-based breast cancer mortality in England.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23761583      PMCID: PMC3705415          DOI: 10.1177/0141076813486779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

1.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Trends in mortality rates comparing underlying-cause and multiple-cause coding in an English population 1979-1998.

Authors:  Michael J Goldacre; Marie E Duncan; Paula Cook-Mozaffari; Myfanwy Griffith
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2003-09

3.  Who evaluates public health programmes? A review of the NHS Breast Screening Programme.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Effect of screening mammography on breast-cancer mortality in Norway.

Authors:  Mette Kalager; Marvin Zelen; Frøydis Langmark; Hans-Olov Adami
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Hormonal and other factors in relation to survival among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  G K Reeves; J Patterson; M P Vessey; D Yeates; L Jones
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2000-05-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Per-Henrik Zahl; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

7.  Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Carlo La Vecchia; Carlo LaVecchia; Lars Vatten; Anna Gavin; Clarisse Héry; Mary Heanue
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-11

8.  Certification of deaths from diabetes mellitus and obesity in England: trends into the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Marie E Duncan; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  Cohort study examining tamoxifen adherence and its relationship to mortality in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  C McCowan; J Shearer; P T Donnan; J A Dewar; M Crilly; A M Thompson; T P Fahey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Breast cancer screening: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Cliona C Kirwan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-23
View more
  20 in total

1.  Complex statistical techniques cannot overcome weak methodology in the evaluation of breast cancer mortality trends.

Authors:  Eugenio Paci; Robert Smith; Mireille Broeders; Stephen Duffy
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Viewpoint: It is time to reconsider policy for population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Anne J Kearney
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.222

3.  Breast cancer mortality trends in England and mammography screening (1971-2009): authors' response.

Authors:  Toqir K Mukhtar; David G Yeates; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?

Authors:  Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

Review 5.  DNA methylation as a promising landscape: A simple blood test for breast cancer prediction.

Authors:  Golnaz Khakpour; Arash Pooladi; Pantea Izadi; Mehrdad Noruzinia; Javad Tavakkoly Bazzaz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-06-16

6.  The Importance of Family History in Breast Cancer Patients in Primary Care Setting: a Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Mehtap Kartal; Nilgun Ozcakar; Sehnaz Hatipoglu; Makbule Neslisah Tan; Azize Dilek Guldal
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The pitfall of the transient, inconsistent anticancer capacity of antiestrogens and the mechanism of apparent antiestrogen resistance.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Suba
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Immediate and delayed effects of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality and incidence in birth cohorts.

Authors:  T M Ripping; A L M Verbeek; D van der Waal; J D M Otten; G J den Heeten; J Fracheboud; H J de Koning; M J M Broeders
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast cancer risk perceptions of Turkish women attending primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mehtap Kartal; Nilgun Ozcakar; Sehnaz Hatipoglu; Makbule Neslisah Tan; Azize Dilek Guldal
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Breast cancer causes and treatment: where are we going wrong?

Authors:  Colin B Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2013-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.