Literature DB >> 22798186

A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes?

Timothy I Carter1, Zhi Ven Fong, Terry Hyslop, Harish Lavu, Wei Phin Tan, Jeffrey Hardacre, Patricia K Sauter, Eugene P Kennedy, Charles J Yeo, Ernest L Rosato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy of two pancreatic remnant closure techniques following distal pancreatectomy: (1) stapled or sutured closure versus (2) stapled or sutured closure plus falciform patch and fibrin glue reinforcement in the setting of a prospective randomized trial, with the primary endpoint being pancreatic fistula. Pancreatic stump leak following left-sided pancreatic resection (distal pancreatectomy) remains common. Despite multiple and varied techniques for closure, the reported leak rate varies up to 30 %. A retrospective analysis by Iannitti et al. (J Am Coll Surg 203(6):857-864, 2006) detected a decreased leak rate in patients receiving a traditional closure buttressed with an autologous falciform ligament patch and fibrin glue.
METHODS: Between April 2008 and October 2011, all willing patients scheduled to undergo distal pancreatectomy at the authors' institutions were consented and enrolled at the preoperative office visit. Patients were intraoperatively stratified as having hard or soft glands and randomized to one of two groups: (1) closure utilizing stapling or suturing (SS) versus (2) stapled or sutured plus falciform ligament patch and fibrin glue (FF). The trial design and power analysis (α = 0.05, β = 0.2, power 80 %, chi-square test) hypothesized that the FF intervention would reduce the primary endpoint (pancreatic fistula) from 30 % to 15 % and targeted an accrual goal of 190 patients. Secondary endpoints included length of postoperative hospital stay, 30-day mortality, hospital readmission, and ISGPF fistula grade (A, B, and C).
RESULTS: The trial accrued 109 patients, 55 in the SS group and 54 in the FF group. Enrollment was closed prior to the target accrual, following an interim analysis and futility calculation. Due to insufficient enrollment, patients stratified as having a hard gland were excluded (n = 8) from analysis, leaving 101 patients in the soft stratum. The overall pancreatic leak rate was 19.8 % (20 patients) for patients with soft glands. Patients randomized to the FF group had a leak rate of 20 %, as compared with 19.6 % in the SS group (p = 1.000). Fistula grades in both groups were identical: 1A, 8B, and 1C in the FF group as compared to 1A, 8B, and 1C in the SS group. Complication rates were comparable between the two groups. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 5 days in both groups. There was a trend towards a higher 30-day readmission rate in the FF group (28 % vs. 17.6 %, p = 0.243).
CONCLUSION: The addition of a falciform ligament patch and fibrin glue to standard stapled or sutured remnant closure did not reduce the rate or severity of pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00889213).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22798186     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-1963-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  25 in total

1.  Mesh reinforcement of pancreatic transection decreases incidence of pancreatic occlusion failure for left pancreatectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicholas A Hamilton; Matthew R Porembka; Fabian M Johnston; Feng Gao; Steven M Strasberg; David C Linehan; William G Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Use of a falciform ligament pedicle flap to decrease pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Dustin M Walters; Jayme B Stokes; Reid B Adams; Todd W Bauer
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  Fibrin sealant: past, present, and future: a brief review.

Authors:  William D Spotnitz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

5.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  High surgical morbidity following distal pancreatectomy: still an unsolved problem.

Authors:  Matthias Reeh; Michael F Nentwich; Dean Bogoevski; Alexandra M Koenig; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Jakob R Izbicki; Maximilian Bockhorn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; R C Russell; S Bramhall; B Theis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Abe Fingerhut; Gilles Fourtanier; Jean-Marie Hay; Franck Holmières; Bernard Sastre; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Markus K Diener; Kaspar Z'graggen; Ulf Hinz; Markus Wagner; Jeannine Bachmann; Jörg Zehetner; Michael W Müller; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  33 in total

1.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding.

Authors:  Christin Tjaden; Ulf Hinz; Matthias Hassenpflug; Franziska Fritz; Stefan Fritz; Lars Grenacher; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Does Pancreatic Stump Closure Method Influence Distal Pancreatectomy Outcomes?

Authors:  Eugene P Ceppa; Robert M McCurdy; David C Becerra; E Molly Kilbane; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Keith D Lillemoe; Henry A Pitt; Michael G House
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Applications of hepatic round ligament/falciform ligament flap and graft in abdominal surgery-a review of their utility and efficacy.

Authors:  Vasudevan Baskaran; Jayant Kumar Banerjee; Sita Ram Ghosh; Sukumar Santosh Kumar; Subramaniam Anand; Govind Menon; Deep Shikha Mishra; Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is probably unrelated to the stapler size but to the drainage modality and significantly decreased with a small suction drain.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak; Fadhel Samir Ftériche; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Béatrice Aussilhou; Igor Duquesne; Genaro Perrone; Chihebeddine Romdhani; Jacques Belghiti; Philippe Lévy; Olivier Soubrane; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Sealing with Cyanoacrylate and a Falciform Patch Cannot Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Laura-Christin Tillmann; Torsten Herzog; Waldemar Uhl; Orlin Belyaev
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Attempts to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Miyasaka; Yasuhisa Mori; Kohei Nakata; Takao Ohtsuka; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Pancreatic Fistula and Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatectomy: Where do We Stand?

Authors:  Ammar A Javed; Kanza Aziz; Fabio Bagante; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Novel surgical technique to prevent pancreatic fistula in distal pancreatectomy using a patch of the falciform ligament.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Fujino; Hiroyoshi Sendo; Taro Oshikiri; Takemi Sugimoto; Masahiro Tominaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Autologous but not Fibrin Sealant Patches for Stump Coverage Reduce Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula in Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maximilian Weniger; Jan Goesta D'Haese; Alexander Crispin; Martin Kurt Angele; Jens Werner; Werner Hartwig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.