Literature DB >> 17414606

Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases.

Jörg Kleeff1, Markus K Diener, Kaspar Z'graggen, Ulf Hinz, Markus Wagner, Jeannine Bachmann, Jörg Zehetner, Michael W Müller, Helmut Friess, Markus W Büchler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify potential risk factors for mortality and morbidity after distal pancreatectomy, with special focus on the formation of pancreatic fistula. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Distal pancreatectomy can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity rates. Pancreatic fistulas, occurring in 10% to 20% of cases, remain a problem that contributes significantly to morbidity, length of stay, and overall costs.
METHODS: From November 1993 to February 2006, perioperative and postoperative data of 302 consecutive patients were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors for morbidity and for the formation of pancreatic fistula were performed. The surgical techniques used for closure were categorized into 4 groups: 1) anastomosis, 2) seromuscular patch, 3) closure by suture, and 4) closure using a stapling device.
RESULTS: Indications for resection were pancreatic tumors in 62% of patients, nonpancreatic tumors in 23%, chronic pancreatitis in 12%, and others in 3%. The spleen was preserved in 24% of patients. The morbidity and mortality rates for distal pancreatectomy in this series were 35% and 2%, respectively. The prevalence of pancreatic fistula was 12%. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that closure using a stapling device and an operating time >or=480 minutes were associated with a higher incidence of pancreatic fistula (odds ratio = 2.6 and 4.2, respectively). Overall morbidity was mainly influenced by the extent of resection (multivisceral vs. conventional; odds ratio = 1.7).
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic leak remains a common complication after distal pancreatectomy. Our series suggests that stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant is associated with a significantly higher fistula rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414606      PMCID: PMC1877036          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251438.43135.fb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  35 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection.

Authors:  M W Büchler; H Friess; M Wagner; C Kulli; V Wagener; K Z'Graggen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; David Linehan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  [Distal pancreatic resection--indications, techniques and complications].

Authors:  U Adam; F Makowiec; H Riediger; S Trzeczak; S Benz; U T Hopt
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.942

5.  Morbidity, mortality, and technical factors of distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Bridget N Fahy; Charles F Frey; Hung S Ho; Laurel Beckett; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

7.  Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation.

Authors:  M M Bilimoria; J N Cormier; Y Mun; J E Lee; D B Evans; P W T Pisters
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure.

Authors:  Steven M Strasberg; Jeffrey A Drebin; Nahush A Mokadam; Douglas W Green; Karen L Jones; Justis P Ehlers; David Linehan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial?

Authors:  Kunio Takeuchi; Yasushi Tsuzuki; Tetsu Ando; Masao Sekihara; Takashi Hara; Takayuki Kori; Hiroki Nakajima; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.872

10.  Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified?

Authors:  Margo Shoup; Kevin C Conlon; David Klimstra; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  115 in total

1.  Modified Blumgart Suturing Technique for Remnant Closure After Distal Pancreatectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Tsutomu Fujii; Suguru Yamada; Kenta Murotani; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masashi Hattori; Mitsuro Kanda; Hideki Takami; Goro Nakayama; Shuji Nomoto; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akimasa Nakao; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: results of a multicenter cohort study on 196 patients.

Authors:  Mushegh A Sahakyan; Airazat M Kazaryan; Majd Rawashdeh; David Fuks; Mark Shmavonyan; Sven-Petter Haugvik; Knut Jørgen Labori; Trond Buanes; Bård Ingvald Røsok; Dejan Ignjatovic; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Brice Gayet; Song Cheol Kim; Bjørn Edwin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Fluid collection after distal pancreatectomy: a frequent finding.

Authors:  Christin Tjaden; Ulf Hinz; Matthias Hassenpflug; Franziska Fritz; Stefan Fritz; Lars Grenacher; Markus W Büchler; Thilo Hackert
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  PolysorbR (an absorbable lactomer) staples, a safe closure technique for distal pancreatic resection.

Authors:  Gyula Farkas; László Leindler; János Márton; György Lázár; Gyula Farkas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Analysis of risk factors for hemorrhage and related outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy in an intermediate-volume center.

Authors:  Fabio Uggeri; Luca Nespoli; Marta Sandini; Anita Andreano; Luca Degrate; Fabrizio Romano; Laura Antolini; Luca Gianotti
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2019-08-02

7.  Radiofrequency is a secure and effective method for pancreatic transection in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: results of a randomized, controlled trial in an experimental model.

Authors:  Dimitri Dorcaratto; Fernando Burdío; Dolors Fondevila; Anna Andaluz; Rita Quesada; Ignasi Poves; Marta Caceres; Xavier Mayol; Enrique Berjano; Luis Grande
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without splenic vessel ligation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gaurav Jain; Saurav Chakravartty; Ameet G Patel
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 9.  Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management.

Authors:  Shailesh-V Shrikhande; Melroy-A D'Souza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Distal Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Resection of the Celiac Axis with Preservation or Reconstruction of the Left Gastric Artery in Patients with Pancreatic Body Cancer.

Authors:  Takafumi Sato; Akio Saiura; Yosuke Inoue; Yu Takahashi; Junichi Arita; Nobuyuki Takemura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.