Literature DB >> 9361591

Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group.

J P Neoptolemos1, R C Russell, S Bramhall, B Theis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that the mortality rate from pancreatic resection for cancer is high in the UK compared with that in published series. A survey of specialist units was conducted to determine whether the results differed from those in general units.
METHODS: The postoperative outcome following resection of pancreatic and periampullary tumours was analysed from specialist units in the UK and compared with that of other multi-institutional and large single institutional studies published recently (1900-1996).
RESULTS: A total of 1026 resections was reported from 21 units (33 surgeons). Postoperative complications necessitated reoperation in 57 patients (6 per cent) and there were 58 deaths (6 per cent) in hospital. Pylorus-preserving resections were performed in 102 (41 per cent) of 250 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma undergoing a major right-sided resection and in 123 (32 per cent) of 381 patients with ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas undergoing right-sided resection (chi 2 = 4.01, 1 d.f., 2P = 0.04). The mean number of resections for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 3.41 (range 1.0-7.1) per institution per year. Combining these data with those from the nine published series from specialist units, there was a lower mortality rate compared with the results of five published general surveys (median 4.9 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 3.1-8.0 per cent) versus 9.8 (2.5-23.2 per cent), 2P < 0.01) and specialist units had a higher volume caseload (median 5.5 (95 per cent c.i. 4.2-8.1) versus 0.5 (-0.2-2.0) cases per institution per year, 2P < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was related to caseload both for the UK (chi 2 = 7.17, 1 d.f., P < 0.01) and for all the data combined (chi 2 = 40.4, 1 d.f., P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The results from specialist units in the UK compare favourably with those from specialist units outside the UK and are superior to those from non-specialist units. The mortality rate is generally lower in units with a higher caseload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9361591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  112 in total

1.  The surgeon as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  T Lerut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  P Ghaneh; J Slavin; R Sutton; M Hartley; J P Neoptolemos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Recent advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Shankar; R C Russell
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Pancreatic surgery: evolution and current tailored approach.

Authors:  Mario Zovak; Dubravka Mužina Mišić; Goran Glavčić
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Regional variations in mortality rates of pancreatic cancer in China: results from 1990-1992 national mortality survey.

Authors:  Ke-Xin Chen; Peizhong Peter Wang; Si-Wei Zhang; Lian-Di Li; Feng-Zhu Lu; Xi-Shan Hao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Pancreaticojejunal bridge-anastomosis: a novel option for surgeon to preserve pancreatic body and tail in urgent reoperation for intra-abdominal massive hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jin Xu; Xianwei Dai; Xianmin Bu; Feng Gao; Xiaobo Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Peri-operative outcomes for pancreatoduodenectomy in India: a multi-centric study.

Authors:  Parul J Shukla; Savio G Barreto; Mms Bedi; N Bheerappa; Adarsh Chaudhary; Md Gandhi; M Jacob; S Jesvanth; Dg Kannan; Vinay K Kapoor; A Kumar; Kk Maudar; Hariharan Ramesh; Ra Sastry; Rajan Saxena; Ajit Sewkani; S Sharma; Shailesh V Shrikhande; A Singh; Rajneesh K Singh; R Surendran; Subodh Varshney; V Verma; V Vimalraj
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 8.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the radiologist's perspective].

Authors:  B D Bundy; H-U Kauczor; L Grenacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Pasquale Lepiane; Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Eugenio Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

Review 10.  Management of remnant pancreatic stump fto prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistulas after distal pancreatectomy: current evidence and our strategy.

Authors:  Isamu Makino; Hirohisa Kitagawa; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Hidehiro Tajima; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.