Literature DB >> 2279234

Comparative physiology of sound localization in four species of owls.

S F Volman1, M Konishi.   

Abstract

Bilateral ear asymmetry is found in some, but not all, species of owls. We investigated the neural basis of sound localization in symmetrical and asymmetrical species, to deduce how ear asymmetry might have evolved from the ancestral condition, by comparing the response properties of neurons in the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICx) of the symmetrical burrowing owl and asymmetrical long-eared owl with previous findings in the symmetrical great horned owl and asymmetrical barn owl. In the ICx of all of these owls, the neurons had spatially restricted receptive fields, and auditory space was topographically mapped. In the symmetrical owls, ICx units were not restricted in elevation, and only azimuth was mapped in ICx. In the barn owl, the space map is two-dimensional, with elevation forming the second dimension. Receptive fields in the long-eared owl were somewhat restricted in elevation, but their tuning was not sharp enough to determine if elevation is mapped. In every species, the primary cue for azimuth was interaural time difference, although ICx units were also tuned for interaural intensity difference (IID). In the barn owl, the IIDs of sounds with frequencies between about 5 and 8 kHz vary systematically with elevation, and the IID selectivity of ICx neurons primarily encodes elevation. In the symmetrical owls, whose ICx neurons do not respond to frequencies above about 5 kHz, IID appears to be a supplementary cue for azimuth. We hypothesize that ear asymmetry can be exploited by owls that have evolved the higher-frequency hearing necessary to generate elevation cues. Thus, the IID selectivity of ICx neurons in symmetrical owls may preadapt them for asymmetry; the neural circuitry that underlies IID selectivity is already present in symmetrical owls, but because IID is not absolutely required to encode azimuth it can come to encode elevation in asymmetrical owls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2279234     DOI: 10.1159/000115307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  15 in total

1.  Effects of interaural intensity difference on the processing of interaural time difference in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  S Viete; J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Auditory evoked potentials of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): implications for directional hearing.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Ruiyu Zeng; Joseph A Sisneros
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Azimuthal sound localization in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): I. Physical binaural cues.

Authors:  G M Klump; O N Larsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 5.  Auditory processing, plasticity, and learning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Jose L Pena; William M DeBello
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2010

6.  Two Types of Auditory Spatial Receptive Fields in Different Parts of the Chicken's Midbrain.

Authors:  Gianmarco Maldarelli; Uwe Firzlaff; Lutz Kettler; Janie M Ondracek; Harald Luksch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Bigger brains or bigger nuclei? Regulating the size of auditory structures in birds.

Authors:  M Fabiana Kubke; Dino P Massoglia; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem.

Authors:  Peggy L Walton; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Electrosensitive spatial vectors in elasmobranch fishes: implications for source localization.

Authors:  Ariel C Rivera-Vicente; Josiah Sewell; Timothy C Tricas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.