Literature DB >> 26398572

Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Catherine E Carr1, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard.   

Abstract

In this paper, we compare some of the neural strategies for sound localization and encoding interaural time differences (ITDs) in three predatory species of Reptilia, alligators, barn owls and geckos. Birds and crocodilians are sister groups among the extant archosaurs, while geckos are lepidosaurs. Despite the similar organization of their auditory systems, archosaurs and lizards use different strategies for encoding the ITDs that underlie localization of sound in azimuth. Barn owls encode ITD information using a place map, which is composed of neurons serving as labeled lines tuned for preferred spatial locations, while geckos may use a meter strategy or population code composed of broadly sensitive neurons that represent ITD via changes in the firing rate.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26398572      PMCID: PMC4772743          DOI: 10.1159/000435946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  77 in total

1.  Comparative physiology of sound localization in four species of owls.

Authors:  S F Volman; M Konishi
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.808

Review 2.  Neuroethological approaches to the evolution of neural systems.

Authors:  S F Volman
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  A circuit for coding interaural time differences in the chick brainstem.

Authors:  E M Overholt; E W Rubel; R L Hyson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  S du Lac; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binaural disparity cues available to the barn owl for sound localization.

Authors:  A Moiseff
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl.

Authors:  T T Takahashi; M Konishi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1988-08-08       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Enhancement of neural synchronization in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to tones at the characteristic frequency.

Authors:  P X Joris; L H Carney; P H Smith; T C Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sound-localization deficits induced by lesions in the barn owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Parallel pathways mediating both sound localization and gaze control in the forebrain and midbrain of the barn owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; P F Knudsen; T Masino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Sound source localization and segregation with internally coupled ears: the treefrog model.

Authors:  Mark A Bee; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.

Authors:  Norman Lee; Jessica L Ward; Alejandro Vélez; Christophe Micheyl; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Evolutionary trends in directional hearing.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Evolution of Sound Source Localization Circuits in the Nonmammalian Vertebrate Brainstem.

Authors:  Peggy L Walton; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Strongly directional responses to tones and conspecific calls in the auditory nerve of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko.

Authors:  Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Paula Kuokkanen; Jamie Emoto Matthews; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A novel concept for dynamic adjustment of auditory space.

Authors:  A Lingner; M Pecka; C Leibold; B Grothe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cooperative population coding facilitates efficient sound-source separability by adaptation to input statistics.

Authors:  Helge Gleiss; Jörg Encke; Andrea Lingner; Todd R Jennings; Sonja Brosel; Lars Kunz; Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Distinct Correlation Structure Supporting a Rate-Code for Sound Localization in the Owl's Auditory Forebrain.

Authors:  Michael V Beckert; Rodrigo Pavão; José L Peña
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-06-30

9.  Against the Epistemological Primacy of the Hardware: The Brain from Inside Out, Turned Upside Down.

Authors:  David Poeppel; Federico Adolfi
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-08-07

10.  Thalamic, cortical, and amygdala involvement in the processing of a natural sound cue of danger.

Authors:  Ana G Pereira; Matheus Farias; Marta A Moita
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.