Literature DB >> 14726625

Bigger brains or bigger nuclei? Regulating the size of auditory structures in birds.

M Fabiana Kubke1, Dino P Massoglia, Catherine E Carr.   

Abstract

Increases in the size of the neuronal structures that mediate specific behaviors are believed to be related to enhanced computational performance. It is not clear, however, what developmental and evolutionary mechanisms mediate these changes, nor whether an increase in the size of a given neuronal population is a general mechanism to achieve enhanced computational ability. We addressed the issue of size by analyzing the variation in the relative number of cells of auditory structures in auditory specialists and generalists. We show that bird species with different auditory specializations exhibit variation in the relative size of their hindbrain auditory nuclei. In the barn owl, an auditory specialist, the hindbrain auditory nuclei involved in the computation of sound location show hyperplasia. This hyperplasia was also found in songbirds, but not in non-auditory specialists. The hyperplasia of auditory nuclei was also not seen in birds with large body weight suggesting that the total number of cells is selected for in auditory specialists. In barn owls, differences observed in the relative size of the auditory nuclei might be attributed to modifications in neurogenesis and cell death. Thus, hyperplasia of circuits used for auditory computation accompanies auditory specialization in different orders of birds. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726625      PMCID: PMC3269630          DOI: 10.1159/000076242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  39 in total

1.  Quantitative study of plasticity in the auditory nuclei of chick under conditions of prenatal sound attenuation and overstimulation with species specific and music sound stimuli.

Authors:  S Wadhwa; P Anand; D Bhowmick
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Rostrocaudal nuclear relationships in the avian medulla oblongata: a fate map with quail chick chimeras.

Authors:  F Cambronero; L Puelles
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2000-11-27       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 3.  Does bigger mean better? Evolutionary determinants of brain size and structure.

Authors:  F Aboitiz
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.808

4.  Prevention of normally occurring and deafferentation-induced neuronal death in chick brainstem auditory neurons by periodic blockade of AMPA/kainate receptors.

Authors:  D Solum; D Hughes; M S Major; T N Parks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo.

Authors:  V HAMBURGER; H L HAMILTON
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1951-01       Impact factor: 1.804

6.  Modulation of the cell cycle contributes to the parcellation of the primate visual cortex.

Authors:  C Dehay; P Giroud; M Berland; I Smart; H Kennedy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-12-02       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Time and intensity cues are processed independently in the auditory system of the owl.

Authors:  T Takahashi; A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl.

Authors:  C E Carr; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Comparative morphometry of mammalian central auditory systems: variation in nuclei and form of the ascending system.

Authors:  K K Glendenning; R B Masterton
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  Organization and development of brain stem auditory nuclei of the chicken: organization of projections from n. magnocellularis to n. laminaris.

Authors:  T N Parks; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  20 in total

1.  Maps of interaural delay in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Sahil Shah; Thomas McColgan; Go Ashida; Paula T Kuokkanen; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Functional delay of myelination of auditory delay lines in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.

Authors:  Shih-Min Cheng; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  GABA immunoreactivity in auditory and song control brain areas of zebra finches.

Authors:  Raphael Pinaud; Claudio V Mello
Journal:  J Chem Neuroanat       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 3.052

4.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Motor pathway convergence predicts syllable repertoire size in oscine birds.

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Tamás Székely; József Büki; Timothy J Devoogd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Habitat-related differences in auditory processing of complex tones and vocal signal properties in four songbirds.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Alejandro Vélez; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Concerted and mosaic evolution of functional modules in songbird brains.

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Timothy J DeVoogd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

10.  The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data.

Authors:  Nicolas Palanca-Castan; Geneviève Laumen; Darrin Reed; Christine Köppl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.