Literature DB >> 31292164

Auditory evoked potentials of the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus): implications for directional hearing.

Andrew D Brown1,2, Ruiyu Zeng3, Joseph A Sisneros2,3,4.   

Abstract

The plainfin midshipman (Porichthys notatus) is an acoustically communicative teleost fish. Here, we evaluated auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) in reproductive female midshipman exposed to tones at or near dominant frequencies of the male midshipman advertisement call. An initial series of experiments characterized AEPs at behaviorally relevant suprathreshold sound levels (130-140 dB SPL re. 1 µPa). AEPs decreased in magnitude with increasing stimulus frequency and featured a stereotyped component at twice the stimulus frequency. Recording electrode position was varied systematically and found to affect AEP magnitude and phase characteristics. Later experiments employed stimuli of a single frequency to evaluate contributions of the saccule to the AEP, with particular attention to the effects of sound source azimuth on AEP amplitude. Unilateral excision of saccular otoliths (sagittae) decreased AEP amplitude; unexpectedly, decreases differed for right versus left otolith excision. A final set of experiments manipulated the sound pressure-responsive swim bladder. Swim bladder excision further reduced the magnitude of AEP responses, effectively eliminating responses at the standard test intensity (130 dB SPL) in some animals. Higher-intensity stimulation yielded response minima at forward azimuths ipsilateral to the excised sagitta, but average cross-azimuth modulation generally remained slight. Collectively, the data underscore that electrode position is an essential variable to control in fish AEP studies and suggest that in female midshipman: (1) the saccule contributes to the AEP, but its directionality as indexed by the AEP is limited, (2) a left-right auditory asymmetry may exist and (3) the swim bladder provides gain in auditory sensitivity that may be important for advertisement call detection and phonotaxis.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic communication; Fish hearing; Sound localization; Swim bladder

Year:  2019        PMID: 31292164      PMCID: PMC6703703          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  38 in total

1.  Steroid-dependent auditory plasticity leads to adaptive coupling of sender and receiver.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Paul M Forlano; David L Deitcher; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Fish otolith mass asymmetry: morphometry and influence on acoustic functionality.

Authors:  D V Lychakov; Y T Rebane
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Audition in sciaenid fishes with different swim bladder-inner ear configurations.

Authors:  John U Ramcharitar; Dennis M Higgs; Arthur N Popper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The microphonic effect of teleost labyrinths and its biological significance.

Authors:  Y Zotterman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1943-12-31       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Ontogenetic changes in the response properties of individual, primary auditory afferents in the vocal plainfin midshipman fish Porichthys notatus Girard.

Authors:  Joseph A Sisneros; Andrew H Bass
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Variability in the role of the gasbladder in fish audition.

Authors:  H Y Yan; M L Fine; N S Horn; W E Colón
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Right ear advantage for conspecific calls in adults and subadults, but not infants, California sea lions (Zalophus californianus): hemispheric specialization for communication?

Authors:  M Böye; O Güntürkün; J Vauclair
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Effects of saccular otolith removal on hearing sensitivity of the sleeper goby (Dormitator latifrons).

Authors:  Z Lu; Z Xu
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Directional selectivity and frequency tuning of midbrain cells in the oyster toadfish, Opsanus tau.

Authors:  P L Edds-Walton; R R Fay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 10.  Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish.

Authors:  Andrew H Bass; Jessica R McKibben
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.