Literature DB >> 22787524

Impact of afterload on the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Sung-A Chang1, Hyung-Kwan Kim, Dae-Won Sohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) is increasingly diagnosed in current aging society. Echocardiography is the most important tool in the assessment of AS and its severity. However, load-dependency of Doppler measurement could affect the accuracy of AS severity assessment. We tried to evaluate the impact of afterload on the assessment of AS severity by modification of afterload using pneumatic compression (Pcom).
METHODS: Forty patients diagnosed as moderate or severe AS [effective orifice area of aortic valve (EOA(AV)) by continuity equation of < 1.5 cm(2)] were consecutively enrolled. Patients with severely uncontrolled hypertension, severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and other significant valve disease were excluded. Comprehensive echocardiography was performed at baseline to assess AS severity. Then, pneumatic compression of the lower extremities by 100 mmHg was applied to increase LV afterload. After 3 minutes, echocardiography was repeated to assess AS severity.
RESULTS: Mean blood pressure was significantly increased under Pcom (p < 0.001), while heart rate remained unchanged. Peak aortic valve velocity (V(max)) was slightly, but significantly decreased under Pcom (p = 0.03). However, Doppler velocity index and EOA(AV) by continuity equation were not affected by Pcom.
CONCLUSION: AS severity assessment by echocardiography was not dependent on the change of LV afterload imposed by Pcom. AV V(max) was slightly decreased with LV afterload increment, but these changes were too small to alter treatment plan of AS patients. EOA(AV) and Doppler velocity index are more stable parameters for AS severity assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Afterload; Aortic stenosis; Echocardiography

Year:  2012        PMID: 22787524      PMCID: PMC3391632          DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2012.20.2.79

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound        ISSN: 1975-4612


  15 in total

1.  Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro.

Authors:  Julia Mascherbauer; Christina Fuchs; Martin Stoiber; Heinrich Schima; Elisabeth Pernicka; Gerald Maurer; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Impact of loading condition on the 2D speckle tracking-derived left ventricular dyssynchrony index in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Hyo Eun Park; Sung-A Chang; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Dong-Ho Shin; Ji-Hyun Kim; Myung-Ki Seo; Yong-Jin Kim; Goo-Yeong Cho; Dae-Won Sohn; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  C M Otto; A S Pearlman; K A Comess; R P Reamer; C L Janko; L L Huntsman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Regulation of the aortic valve opening. In vivo dynamic measurement of aortic valve orifice area.

Authors:  M Higashidate; K Tamiya; T Beppu; Y Imai
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  H Ihlen; J P Amlie; J Dale; K Forfang; S Nitter-Hauge; J E Otterstad; S Simonsen; E Myhre
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1984-01

6.  Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Stephen H Little; Kwan-Leung Chan; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample.

Authors:  M Lindroos; M Kupari; J Heikkilä; R Tilvis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  The mechanism of opening of the aortic valve.

Authors:  M Thubrikar; L P Bosher; S P Nolan
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.

Authors:  Zeineb Hachicha; Jean G Dumesnil; Peter Bogaty; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Epidemiology and cardiovascular risk factors of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Pompilio Faggiano; Francesco Antonini-Canterin; Ferdinando Baldessin; Roberto Lorusso; Antonio D'Aloia; Livio Dei Cas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 2.062

View more
  2 in total

1.  Problem is in the subclinical afterload mismatch.

Authors:  Eui-Young Choi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-25

2.  Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Concentric Remodeling in Aortic Stenosis and Its Regression after Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Jang; Jeong-Sook Seo; Byung Joo Sun; Dae-Hee Kim; Jong-Min Song; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-09-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.