Literature DB >> 17135222

Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Stephen H Little1, Kwan-Leung Chan, Ian G Burwash.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of blood pressure (BP) on the Doppler echocardiographic (Doppler-echo) evaluation of severity of aortic stenosis (AS).
METHODS: Handgrip exercise or phenylephrine infusion was used to increase BP in 22 patients with AS. Indices of AS severity (mean pressure gradient (DeltaP(mean)), aortic valve area (AVA), valve resistance, percentage left ventricular stroke work loss (% LVSW loss) and the energy loss coefficient (ELCo)) were measured at baseline, peak BP intervention and recovery.
RESULTS: From baseline to peak intervention, mean (SD) BP increased (99 (8) vs 121 (10) mm Hg, p<0.001), systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased (1294 (264) vs 1552 (372) dynexs/cm(5), p<0.001) and mean (SD) transvalvular flow rate (Q(mean)) decreased (323 (67) vs 306 (66) ml/s, p = 0.02). There was no change in DeltaP(mean) (36 (13) vs 36 (14) mm Hg, p = NS). However, there was a decrease in AVA (1.15 (0.32) vs 1.09 (0.33) cm(2), p = 0.02) and ELCo (1.32 (0.40) vs 1.24 (0.42) cm(2), p = 0.04), and an increase in valve resistance (153 (63) vs 164 (74) dynexs/cm(5), p = 0.02), suggesting a more severe valve stenosis. In contrast, % LVSW loss decreased (19.8 (6) vs 16.5 (6)%, p<0.001), suggesting a less severe valve stenosis. There was an inverse relationship between the change in mean BP and AVA (r = -0.34, p = 0.02); however, only the change in Q(mean) was an independent predictor of the change in AVA (r = 0.81, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute BP elevation due to increased SVR can affect the Doppler-echo evaluation of AS severity. However, the impact of BP on the assessment of AS severity depends primarily on the associated change in Q(mean), rather than on an independent effect of SVR or arterial compliance, and can result in a valve appearing either more or less stenotic depending on the direction and magnitude of the change in Q(mean).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17135222      PMCID: PMC1994465          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.098392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  45 in total

1.  Transaortic gradient is pressure-dependent in a pulsatile model of the circulation.

Authors:  R Razzolini; G Gerosa; L Leoni; D Casarotto; R Chioin; S Dalla-Volta
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-05

2.  Can high blood pressure mask severe aortic stenosis?

Authors:  J Chambers
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1999-05

3.  Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis?

Authors:  F Antonini-Canterin; P Faggiano; D Zanuttini; F Ribichini
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention.

Authors:  Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce Whitney Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffrey L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Valentin Fuster; Jonathan L Halperin; Loren F Hiratzka; Sharon A Hunt; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  L Kadem; J G Dumesnil; R Rieu; L-G Durand; D Garcia; P Pibarot
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  J Bermejo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study.

Authors:  C G DeGroff; R Shandas; L Valdes-Cruz
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-04-28       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula?: Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states.

Authors:  J Segal; D J Lerner; D C Miller; R S Mitchell; E A Alderman; R L Popp
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effects of age and hypertension on cardiac responses to the alpha1-agonist phenylephrine in humans.

Authors:  M White; A Fourney; E Mikes; F H Leenen
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.689

View more
  17 in total

1.  Assessment of aortic stenosis severity: check the valve but don't forget the arteries!

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Echocardiographic Evaluation of Aortic Stenosis - Normal Flow and Low Flow Scenarios.

Authors:  Ian G Burwash
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2014-12

3.  Impact of afterload on the assessment of severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Sung-A Chang; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Dae-Won Sohn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 4.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  New approaches to quantifying aortic stenosis severity.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Cary Akins
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Aortic valve stenosis and arterial hypertension: a synopsis in 2013.

Authors:  Vasiliki Katsi; Maria Marketou; Manolis S Kallistratos; Thomas Makris; Athanasios J Manolis; Dimitris Tousoulis; Christodoulos Stefanadis; Panos Vardas; Ioannis Kallikazaros
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  New concepts in valvular hemodynamics: implications for diagnosis and treatment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  High transvalvular pressure gradients on intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography after aortic valve replacement: what does it mean?

Authors:  A Parnell; J Swanevelder
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2009

9.  Problem is in the subclinical afterload mismatch.

Authors:  Eui-Young Choi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 10.  Paradoxical low flow and/or low gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot; Blase Carabello
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.