Literature DB >> 22773989

Data analysis of low dose multislice helical CT scan in orbital trauma.

Ji-Wei Wang1, Chong Tang, Bo-Rong Pan.   

Abstract

AIM: To explore the optimal low dose of MSCT in orbital trauma examination.
METHODS: Sixty transverse images of the fracture layer were selected. Low-dose images acquired at 30, 70, 100, 140, 170, and 200 milliampere (mA) were simulated by adding noise to the image space using software. After assessing the images according to the conditions of image quality and fracture, we found the optimal tube current that met diagnostic requirements and then applied it to clinical use. The CT Dose Index volume (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) and effective dose (ED) were recorded. The image quality was classified as good, fairly good, ordinary, poor, or very poor according to image level, noise, anatomic structure and whether the diagnostic requirements were met or not. The rank-sum test was used to perform statistical analysis on the ranked data. The Chi-square test was used for the numerical data.
RESULTS: Under the scan conditions of a conventional dose of 300 mA, 60 cases of orbital fracture, 38 cases of orbital emphysema, 25 cases of ocular damage, and 3 cases of intraorbital foreign body were demonstrated in the images of the 60 orbital trauma patients. Among the low dose simulated images, the image quality difference of the different doses was of statistical significance (χ(2)=15.678, P=0.016). When the dose was lowered to 70 mA, the above mentioned clinical signs were still clear and diagnostic, however the image quality assessment results indicated that 2 cases were good, 16 cases were fairly good, and 42 cases were ordinary, poor or very poor. When the simulated dose tube current was 100mA, the image quality assessment results were 18 cases good, 34 cases fairly good, and 8 cases ordinary, poor and very poor; compared with the conventional dose, there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). When using a 100 mA tube current to examine 40 cases of orbital trauma patients in the clinic, the acquired image quality was 10 cases good, 26 cases fairly good and 4 cases ordinary, without any cases of poor or very poor. The CTDIvol, DLP and ED were 20.72mGy, 124.97 mGy·cm and 0.26mSv, respectively, while the CTDIvol, DLP and ED were 62.53mGy, 375.18 mGy•GTtl and 0.86mSv, respectively, when using a conventional dose of 300 mA. Compared with the tube current of 100 mA for scanning, the ED declined 70%.
CONCLUSION: When conducting an MSCT scan for orbital trauma, the acquired images using the 100 mA tube current can meet the clinical diagnostic requirements, and the radiation dose to the patients can be decreased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray computed tomography; body section radiography; orbit; radiation dose

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773989      PMCID: PMC3388409          DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.03.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  18 in total

Review 1.  CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required?

Authors:  Thomas L Slovis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computer-simulation technique for low dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Kouzou Hanai; Tetsuya Horiuchi; Junko Sekiguchi; Yoshihisa Muramatsu; Ryutaro Kakinuma; Noriyuki Moriyama; Ryosuke Tuchiiya; Noboru Niki
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  SPECTCT cerebral perfusion scintigraphy; is the low-dose CT component of diagnostic value?

Authors:  T V C Sulkin; C Cousens
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  The development and use of a chest phantom for optimizing scanning techniques on a variety of low-dose helical computed tomography devices.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Muramatsu; Yukihiro Tsuda; Yoshimasa Nakamura; Mitsuru Kubo; Toshiyuki Takayama; Kouzou Hanai
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT.

Authors:  S A Sohaib; P D Peppercorn; J A Horrocks; M H Keene; G S Kenyon; R H Reznek
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Radiation and cataract.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Eliseo Vano; Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac; Norman J Kleiman
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols.

Authors:  J E Wilting; A Zwartkruis; M S van Leeuwen; J Timmer; A G Kamphuis; M Feldberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Conventional and reduced radiation dose of 16-MDCT for detection of nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis.

Authors:  Erik K Paulson; Carolyn Weaver; Lisa M Ho; Lucie Martin; Jianying Li; James Darsie; Donald P Frush
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Multidetector CT of the paranasal sinus: potential for radiation dose reduction.

Authors:  Matthias H Brem; Amir A Zamani; Roberto Riva; Kelly H Zou; Zoran Rumboldt; Friedrich F Hennig; Ron Kikinis; Alexander M Norbash; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The risk of radiation exposure to the eyes of the interventional pain physician.

Authors:  David E Fish; Andrew Kim; Christopher Ornelas; Sungchan Song; Sanjog Pangarkar
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-05-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction in multidetector CT in fracture evaluation.

Authors:  Jung Woo Yi; Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Myung Ho Rho; Hyun Pyo Hong; Yoon Jung Choi; Mi Sung Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Preoperative imaging should be performed prior to surgery in all cases of acquired nasolacrimal obstruction-Yes.

Authors:  S K Freitag; J C P Roos
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.