Literature DB >> 20551360

Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts.

Manuel Perea1, Pablo Gómez, Isabel Fraga.   

Abstract

The pattern of masked repetition priming effects for word and nonword targets differs across tasks: Masked-priming effects in lexical decision occur for positive responses (i.e., words), but not for negative responses (nonwords), whereas masked-priming effects in the cross-case same-different task occur for positive responses (same), but not for negative responses (different)--regardless of lexical status. Here, we examined whether masked nonword priming effects are greater when the task involves an active go response to nonwords than when it involves the standard yes/no procedure in lexical decision. The obtained masked repetition priming effect for nonwords was of similar size in yes/no and go/no-go tasks. This finding is compatible with accounts of nonword priming that posit that nonword responses are produced by actively accumulating evidence for the nonword alternative in yes/no and go/no-go procedures, whereas it is inconsistent with the assumption of a deadline for no responses in the yes/no task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20551360     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming.

Authors:  M E Masson; M I Isaak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

2.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

3.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-02

4.  BuscaPalabras: a program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish.

Authors:  Colin J Davis; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-11

5.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

6.  Being forward not backward: lexical limits to masked priming.

Authors:  Chris Davis; Jeesun Kim; Kenneth I Forster
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-09-04

7.  Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Joana Acha
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-12-09

8.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-08

9.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Paul L Speckman; Dongchu Sun; Richard D Morey; Geoffrey Iverson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model.

Authors:  J Grainger; A M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does the advantage of the upper part of words occur at the lexical level?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Montserrat Comesaña; Ana P Soares
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

2.  Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers.

Authors:  Mahmoud M Elsherif; Linda Ruth Wheeldon; Steven Frisson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.138

3.  A diffusion model account of masked versus unmasked priming: are they qualitatively different?

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Manuel Perea; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Individual differences in response speed and accuracy are associated to specific brain activities of two interacting systems.

Authors:  Rinaldo Livio Perri; Marika Berchicci; Donatella Spinelli; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Phonological-Lexical Feedback during Early Abstract Encoding: The Case of Deaf Readers.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Ana Marcet; Marta Vergara-Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.