Literature DB >> 12943238

Risk coefficients for childhood cancer after intrauterine irradiation: a review.

R Wakeford1, M P Little.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To review the estimates of the risk of childhood cancer per unit dose of radiation received in utero derived from the largest case-control study of obstetric X-ray examinations and to compare them with the childhood cancer risk coefficients obtained from the cohorts of Japanese atomic bomb survivors irradiated either in utero or as young children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancers (OSCC) case-control study of foetal exposure to diagnostic X-rays and from the cohort studies of the Japanese survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were used, together with associated dose estimates. Excess relative risk and excess absolute risk coefficients were compared, fully taking into consideration the various sources of uncertainty.
RESULTS: The excess relative risk coefficient for childhood (< 15 years of age) cancer obtained from the OSCC was around 50 Gy(-1), leading to an excess absolute risk coefficient for incident cases of about 8% Gy(-1). However, the statistical, dosimetry, modelling and other uncertainties associated with these risk estimates are appreciable, and there is reason to believe that these coefficients could be systematic overestimates. When these uncertainties and those associated with the equivalent risk coefficients derived from the Japanese cohort exposed in utero are taken into account, the risk estimates for childhood cancer obtained from these two sources are compatible. These coefficients are consistent with the high relative risk of childhood leukaemia among the Japanese survivors exposed as children. The absence of cases of childhood solid tumours among the Japanese children irradiated after birth in contrast to the significant excesses found in both intrauterine exposure studies might be explained by the cells from which these cancers originate being predominantly sensitive only to exposure in utero.
CONCLUSIONS: The consistency of the childhood cancer risk coefficients derived from the Oxford Survey and from the Japanese cohort irradiated in utero supports a causal explanation of the association between childhood cancer and an antenatal X-ray examination found in case-control studies. This implies that doses to the foetus in utero of the order of 10 mSv discernibly increase the risk of childhood cancer. However, uncertainties in risk estimates are such that it is difficult to conclude reliably from these epidemiological data what the level of risk at these low doses might be, beyond the inference that the risk is not zero or has been grossly underestimated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943238     DOI: 10.1080/0955300031000114729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  42 in total

1.  Effects of ionizing radiation on self-renewal and pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Kitchener D Wilson; Ning Sun; Mei Huang; Wendy Y Zhang; Andrew S Lee; Zongjin Li; Shan X Wang; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  The statistical power of epidemiological studies analyzing the relationship between exposure to ionizing radiation and cancer, with special reference to childhood leukemia and natural background radiation.

Authors:  M P Little; R Wakeford; J H Lubin; G M Kendall
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  On pre- or postnatal diagnostic X-rays as a risk factor for childhood leukaemia.

Authors:  Richard Wakeford
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Nonlinear response for neoplastic transformation following low doses of low let radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2005-01

Review 6.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Risk of solid cancer in the offspring of female workers of the Mayak nuclear facility in the Southern Urals, Russian Federation.

Authors:  Y Tsareva; I Deltour; M Sokolnikov; P Okatenko; V V Vostrotin; S J Schonfeld; J Schüz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Prenatal X-ray exposure and rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Seymour Grufferman; Frederick Ruymann; Simona Ognjanovic; Erik B Erhardt; Harold M Maurer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Cancer in the offspring of female radiation workers: a record linkage study.

Authors:  K J Bunch; C R Muirhead; G J Draper; N Hunter; G M Kendall; J A O'Hagan; M A Phillipson; T J Vincent; W Zhang
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Very low dose fetal exposure to Chernobyl contamination resulted in increases in infant leukemia in Europe and raises questions about current radiation risk models.

Authors:  Christopher C Busby
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.