Literature DB >> 27561670

Vibrant Soundbridge® in preschool children with unilateral aural atresia: acceptance and benefit.

M Leinung1, E Zaretsky2, B P Lange3, V Hoffmann4, T Stöver1, C Hey5.   

Abstract

The aim of this pilot study was to determine the acceptance and benefit from the middle ear implant system Vibrant Soundbridge® (VSB, MED-EL Corporation, Austria) by means of a questionnaire, compared to a previously used conventional bone conducting hearing device, in preschool children with unilateral congenital aural atresia. Prospective cohort study. All nine children with unilateral congenital aural atresia used the VSB and had previous experience with a bone conducting hearing device. The benefit from the VSB was evaluated by questionnaires concerning acceptance of hearing aids, handling, listening effort, behavior, quality of life, and the duration of daily use and compared to the experience with the bone conducting hearing device. In addition, to quantify the benefit from the VSB use, audiological assessment (pure-tone audiometry via free field testing, speech audiometry, and localization test) was performed with and without VSB. The questionnaires and audiological test results were compared pairwise. According to all questionnaire areas, children benefited significantly more from the VSB compared to bone conducting hearing device (ps <.05). The most important finding was a significant increase in daily use from 2 h for the bone conducting hearing device to 10 h for the VSB. Children performed significantly better with the VSB than without it in the audiological assessment. Children with unilateral aural atresia benefited significantly more from the VSB compared to a conventional bone conducting hearing device according to the parents' questionnaires and yielded better results in the audiometry and localization test with the VSB than without it.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone conducting hearing device; Middle-ear implant; Unilateral aural atresia; Vibrant Soundbridge

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27561670     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4265-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  29 in total

1.  Comparison of psychometric properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-hA) in various studies.

Authors:  Heike Heuermann; Martin Kinkel; Jürgen Tchorz
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Sigfrid D Soli; Marco Carner; L Colletti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Magnet resonance imaging safety of the Vibrant Soundbridge system: a review.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Wagner; Arne Ernst; Ingo Todt
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].

Authors:  J Löhler; L Moser; D Heinrich; K Hörmann; L E Walther
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  [Bone Conduction and Active Middle Ear Implants].

Authors:  S Volkenstein; J P Thomas; S Dazert
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.057

6.  Active middle ear implants: Vibroplasty™ in children and adolescents with acquired or congenital middle ear disorders.

Authors:  Pedro Clarós; María del Carmen Pujol
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Do audiologic characteristics predict outcomes in children with unilateral hearing loss?

Authors:  Judith E C Lieu; Roanne K Karzon; Banan Ead; Nancy Tye-Murray
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Non-organic hearing loss in childhood.

Authors:  Shinya Morita; Masanobu Suzuki; Keiji Iizuka
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  The Lübeck flowchart for functional and aesthetic rehabilitation of aural atresia and microtia.

Authors:  Henning Frenzel; Reiner Schönweiler; Frauke Hanke; Armin Steffen; Barbara Wollenberg
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Application of the Vibrant Soundbridge to unilateral osseous atresia cases.

Authors:  Henning Frenzel; Frauke Hanke; Millo Beltrame; Armin Steffen; Rainer Schönweiler; Barbara Wollenberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sound-localisation performance in patients with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia fitted with an active middle ear implant.

Authors:  Chunli Zhao; Yujie Liu; Jinsong Yang; Peiwei Chen; Mengdie Gao; Shouqin Zhao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The vibrating ossicular prosthesis in children and adolescents: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Jan Maurer; John-Martin Hempel; Assen Koitschev; Daniela Hollfelder; Henning Frenzel; Barbara Wollenberg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Speech performance and subjective satisfaction of middle ear implant in congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Farid Alzhrani; Salman F Alhabib; Medhat Yousef
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.618

4.  Response to: Comment on "Original Solution for Middle Ear Implant and Anesthetic/Surgical Management in a Child with Severe Craniofacial Dysmorphism".

Authors:  Giovanni Bianchin; Lorenzo Tribi; Aronne Reverzani; Patrizia Formigoni; Valeria Polizzi
Journal:  Case Rep Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.