Literature DB >> 12918615

Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view.

Robyn M Cox1.   

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the measurement of hearing aid fitting outcomes in real life using self-report methods. Three topics are addressed: (1) why we should measure real-life outcomes; (2) seven different types of self-report outcome data; and (3) issues to consider in self-report outcome measurement. It is stressed that self-report data provide a unique view of the way that clients function and feel in their daily lives with regard to their hearing health. Self-report outcome data are multidimensional, and the different domains are only moderately correlated. When these types of data are gathered, it is essential to control relevant variables to safeguard validity and reliability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12918615     DOI: 10.3109/14992020309074629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  14 in total

1.  The WHO-DAS II: psychometric properties in the measurement of functional health status in adults with acquired hearing loss.

Authors:  Theresa H Chisolm; Harvey B Abrams; Rachel McArdle; Richard H Wilson; Patrick J Doyle
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Comparative studies on hearing aid selection and fitting procedures: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mick Metselaar; Bert Maat; Hans Verschuure; Wouter A Dreschler; Louw Feenstra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Is the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Independent of Personality?

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Kelsey Dumanch; Elizabeth Stangl; Christi Miller; Kelly Tremblay; Ruth Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Short-term hearing aid benefit in a large group.

Authors:  Peter J Ivory; Bryan L Hendricks; Dennis Van Vliet; Cynthia M Beyer; Harvey B Abrams
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-12

5.  [Results of clinical use of the German version of the APHAB].

Authors:  J Löhler; L Moser; D Heinrich; K Hörmann; L E Walther
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Level of user satisfaction with hearing AIDS and environment: the international outcome inventory for hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Lorena Kozlowski; Gleide Almeida; Angela Ribas
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-16

8.  A Comparative Study on Hearing Aid Benefits of Digital Hearing Aid Use (BTE) from Six Months to Two Years.

Authors:  Lukeshwari Verma; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Bibina Scaria; Mayank Awasthi; Aparna Ravichandran; Ashritha Kaki; Savalam Gnana Rathna Prakash
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-02

9.  The use of research questionnaires with hearing impaired adults: online vs. paper-and-pencil administration.

Authors:  Elisabet Sundewall Thorén; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2012-10-29

Review 10.  A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults With Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners.

Authors:  Venessa Vas; Michael A Akeroyd; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.