OBJECTIVE: To distinguish components of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque by imaging their energy response using spectral CT and comparing images with histology. METHODS: After spectroscopic calibration using phantoms of plaque surrogates, excised human carotid atherosclerotic plaques were imaged using MARS CT using a photon-processing detector with a silicon sensor layer and microfocus X-ray tube (50 kVp, 0.5 mA) at 38-μm voxel size. The plaques were imaged, sectioned and re-imaged using four threshold energies: 10, 16, 22 and 28 keV; then sequentially stained with modified Von Kossa, Perl's Prussian blue and Oil-Red O, and photographed. Relative Hounsfield units across the energies were entered into a linear algebraic material decomposition model to identify the unknown plaque components. RESULTS: Lipid, calcium, iron and water-like components of plaque have distinguishable energy responses to X-ray, visible on spectral CT images. CT images of the plaque surface correlated very well with histological photographs. Calcium deposits (>1,000 μm) in plaque are larger than iron deposits (<100 μm), but could not be distinguished from each other within the same voxel using the energy range available. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral CT displays energy information in image form at high spatial resolution, enhancing the intrinsic contrast of lipid, calcium and iron within atheroma. KEY POINTS: Spectral computed tomography offers new insights into tissue characterisation. Components of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque are spectrally distinct with intrinsic contrast. Spectral CT of excised atherosclerotic plaques can display iron, calcium and lipid. Calcium deposits are larger than iron deposits in atheroma. Spectral CT may help in the non-invasive detection of vulnerable plaques.
OBJECTIVE: To distinguish components of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque by imaging their energy response using spectral CT and comparing images with histology. METHODS: After spectroscopic calibration using phantoms of plaque surrogates, excised human carotid atherosclerotic plaques were imaged using MARS CT using a photon-processing detector with a silicon sensor layer and microfocus X-ray tube (50 kVp, 0.5 mA) at 38-μm voxel size. The plaques were imaged, sectioned and re-imaged using four threshold energies: 10, 16, 22 and 28 keV; then sequentially stained with modified Von Kossa, Perl's Prussian blue and Oil-Red O, and photographed. Relative Hounsfield units across the energies were entered into a linear algebraic material decomposition model to identify the unknown plaque components. RESULTS:Lipid, calcium, iron and water-like components of plaque have distinguishable energy responses to X-ray, visible on spectral CT images. CT images of the plaque surface correlated very well with histological photographs. Calcium deposits (>1,000 μm) in plaque are larger than iron deposits (<100 μm), but could not be distinguished from each other within the same voxel using the energy range available. CONCLUSIONS: Spectral CT displays energy information in image form at high spatial resolution, enhancing the intrinsic contrast of lipid, calcium and iron within atheroma. KEY POINTS: Spectral computed tomography offers new insights into tissue characterisation. Components of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque are spectrally distinct with intrinsic contrast. Spectral CT of excised atherosclerotic plaques can display iron, calcium and lipid. Calcium deposits are larger than iron deposits in atheroma. Spectral CT may help in the non-invasive detection of vulnerable plaques.
Authors: Michael Anthony Hurrell; Anthony Philip Howard Butler; Nicholas James Cook; Philip Howard Butler; J Paul Ronaldson; Rafidah Zainon Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Daniel T Boll; Martin H Hoffmann; Nadine Huber; Andrea S Bossert; Andrik J Aschoff; Thorsten R Fleiter Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Tobias Saam; Thomas S Hatsukami; Norihide Takaya; Baocheng Chu; Hunter Underhill; William S Kerwin; Jianming Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J P Schlomka; E Roessl; R Dorscheid; S Dill; G Martens; T Istel; C Bäumer; C Herrmann; R Steadman; G Zeitler; A Livne; R Proksa Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-07-08 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Sasan Partovi; Matthias Loebe; Markus Aschwanden; Thomas Baldi; Kurt A Jäger; Steven B Feinstein; Daniel Staub Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: H R Underhill; C Yuan; V L Yarnykh; B Chu; M Oikawa; L Dong; N L Polissar; G A Garden; S C Cramer; T S Hatsukami Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Alexander C Langheinrich; Marian Kampschulte; Christine Crössmann; Regina Moritz; Wigbert S Rau; Rainer M Bohle; Erik L Ritman Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Damini Dey; Piotr Slomka; Daisy Chien; David Fieno; Aiden Abidov; Rola Saouaf; Louise Thomson; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Shuai Leng; Michael Bruesewitz; Shengzhen Tao; Kishore Rajendran; Ahmed F Halaweish; Norbert G Campeau; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: Radiographics Date: 2019 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Auranuch Lorsakul; Georges El Fakhri; William Worstell; Jinsong Ouyang; Yothin Rakvongthai; Andrew F Laine; Quanzheng Li Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2016-07-12
Authors: Lawrence Chun Man Lau; Wayne Yuk Wai Lee; Anthony P H Butler; Alex I Chernoglazov; Kwong Yin Chung; Kevin Ki Wai Ho; James Griffith; Philip H Butler; Patrick Shu Hang Yung Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marzieh Anjomrouz; Muhammad Shamshad; Raj K Panta; Lieza Vanden Broeke; Nanette Schleich; Ali Atharifard; Raja Aamir; Srinidhi Bheesette; Michael F Walsh; Brian P Goulter; Stephen T Bell; Christopher J Bateman; Anthony P H Butler; Philip H Butler Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 2.102