Literature DB >> 6150496

Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats licking sucrose solutions in an anhedonia paradigm.

S E Gramling, S C Fowler, K R Collins.   

Abstract

The present work examines the generalizability of the anhedonia phenomenon (extinction-like responding with repeated neuroleptic treatment) by examining rats' licking behavior, a response heretofore untested, in the anhedonia paradigm. Nondeprived rats learned to lick a sucrose solution (32%) and were then tested for eight consecutive days in either a no-reward condition (N = 8) or two pimozide (PIM) with reward conditions (N = 8 at each of these two doses: 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg). PIM treated animals did not exhibit rates or patterns of responding equivalent to animals in the extinction condition. Instead of an across session decline in rate, PIM treated animals showed a trend towards recovery on the rate measure. Within session patterns of responding of PIM treated animals more closely resembled animals in a normally rewarded condition responding at a generally lower rate, than animals in an extinction condition. The experimental procedure included the the use of home cage control animals, replication of the intermittent dosing procedure, and tests for transfer effects; all of these failed to produce patterns of responding typically obtained in the anhedonia paradigm when the response is lever pressing. Median lick duration and median interlick interval (ILI) were both lengthened with PIM treatment relative to injection control and extinction conditions, suggesting that pimozide treatment creates a motoric deficit. Taken together these results emphasize the importance of neuroleptics' motor vis a vis anhedonic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6150496     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(84)80047-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  19 in total

Review 1.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding.

Authors:  Brian A Baldo; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Chlorpromazine and pimozide alter reinforcement efficacy and motor performance.

Authors:  G M Heyman; D L Kinzie; L S Seiden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Tests of functional equivalence between pimozide pretreatment, extinction and free feeding.

Authors:  P Willner; K Chawla; D Sampson; S Sophokleous; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for a isotonic NaCl solution.

Authors:  Adriana Galistu; Paolo S D'Aquila
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Inactivation of the median raphe nucleus increases intake of sucrose solutions: a microstructural analysis.

Authors:  David Wirtshafter; John D Davis; Thomas R Stratford
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  The fine temporal structure of the rat licking pattern: what causes the variabiliy in the interlick intervals and how is it affected by the drinking solution?

Authors:  Xiong Bin Lin; Dwight R Pierce; Kim Edward Light; Abdallah Hayar
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Sensitization to haloperidol-induced suppression of milk intake: effect of interdose interval.

Authors:  D L Wolgin; J Moore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Dopamine and reward: the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on.

Authors:  Roy A Wise
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.