Literature DB >> 15573488

Gradient change in the acquisition of phonology.

Nigel Hewlett1, Daphne Waters.   

Abstract

The prevailing view of phonological development is that changes in pronunciation are driven by phonological changes. This view (it is argued here) derives from the particular form of the data that has most often been used in studies of phonological development, namely broad phonetic transcriptions. Transcribing an earlier pronunciation with one phoneme symbol and a later pronunciation with a different symbol encourages the interpretation that the child has made a flip from one category to another. However, broad transcriptions may have misrepresented the facts of speech development. We review some auditory-based studies which have used a more fine-grained phonetic transcription and discuss the significance of findings on the development of long-lag plosives. We argue that gradient change is the typical fashion in which children's speech output development progresses; that it is therefore not appropriate to use rules of the sort that are employed for morphophonemic alternations in adult phonology to explain revisions over time in children's pronunciations; and that a child's speech output is not the best guide to their phonology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15573488     DOI: 10.1080/02699200410001703673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  5 in total

1.  Deconstructing phonetic transcription: covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of Vox Humana.

Authors:  Benjamin Munson; Jan Edwards; Sarah K Schellinger; Mary E Beckman; Marie K Meyer
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy.

Authors:  Hannah M Julien; Benjamin Munson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Deriving gradient measures of child speech from crowdsourced ratings.

Authors:  Tara McAllister Byun; Daphna Harel; Peter F Halpin; Daniel Szeredi
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 2.288

4.  Quantifying the Robustness of the English Sibilant Fricative Contrast in Children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Holliday; Patrick F Reidy; Mary E Beckman; Jan Edwards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts.

Authors:  Daphna Harel; Elaine Russo Hitchcock; Daniel Szeredi; José Ortiz; Tara McAllister Byun
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.346

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.