Literature DB >> 24869926

Incidence and management of hip dislocation in tumour patients with a modular prosthesis of the proximal femur.

Stephan E Puchner1, Philipp T Funovics, Christian Hipfl, Martin Dominkus, Reinhard Windhager, Jochen G Hofstaetter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Little data is available about the incidence and especially the management of hip dislocation following the implantation of modular tumor prostheses of the proximal femur. In this retrospective single-centre study we assessed the incidence of hip dislocation following implantation of a proximal femoral modular prosthesis as well as the success of the subsequent surgical or non-surgical treatment in tumor patients.
METHODS: Between 1982 and 2008, 166 tumor patients received a modular prosthesis of the proximal femur at our institution. The average age at the time of surgery was 50 ± 20 years (range, six to 84 years). An additional pelvic reconstruction was done in 14 patients. An artificial band for soft tissue reconstruction of the hip was used in 19 patients. The average time of follow-up was 46 ± 64 months (range, one to 277 months).
RESULTS: The overall dislocation rate after proximal femoral replacement was 13% after a mean time of seven ± eight months (range, 0.3-33 months) after surgery. Between 1982 and 1986 the dislocation rate was 33% and declined to 9% in subsequent years (1987-2008). Patients who had received an additional pelvic reconstruction had a three fold higher dislocation rate (p <0.05). Patients with closed reduction had a 58% (eight of 12) re-dislocation rate compared to 11% (one of nine) for open reduction (p = 0.0357).
CONCLUSIONS: Dislocation of a modular prosthesis of the proximal femur is a common complication, especially in cases with additional pelvic resection with extensive bone and soft-tissue defects. Open surgical management may be more effective in preventing re-dislocation than closed reduction and bracing alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24869926      PMCID: PMC4115123          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2376-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

1.  Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube.

Authors:  G Gosheger; A Hillmann; N Lindner; R Rödl; C Hoffmann; H Bürger; W Winkelmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo and in vitro cellular ingrowth into a new generation of artificial ligaments.

Authors:  K Trieb; H Blahovec; G Brand; M Sabeti; M Dominkus; R Kotz
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.745

Review 3.  Proximal femoral replacements with megaprostheses.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Franklin H Sim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Limb salvage in periacetabular sarcomas: review of 21 consecutive cases.

Authors:  R Windhager; J Karner; H P Kutschera; P Polterauer; M Salzer-Kuntschik; R Kotz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Allograft-prosthesis composite versus megaprosthesis in proximal femoral reconstruction.

Authors:  R J Zehr; W F Enneking; M T Scarborough
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty : an analysis of risk factors and treatment options.

Authors:  Gregory M Alberton; Whitney A High; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Modular prosthetic replacement of the proximal femur after resection of a bone tumour a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  D Donati; M Zavatta; E Gozzi; S Giacomini; L Campanacci; M Mercuri
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-11

8.  Rates and outcomes of primary and revision total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

Authors:  Nizar N Mahomed; Jane A Barrett; Jeffrey N Katz; Charlotte B Phillips; Elena Losina; Robert A Lew; Edward Guadagnoli; William H Harris; Robert Poss; John A Baron
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Tendons attached to prostheses by tendon-bone block fixation: an experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  F Gottsauner-Wolf; E L Egger; F M Schultz; F H Sim; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.

Authors:  A L Malkani; J J Settecerri; F H Sim; E Y Chao; S L Wallrichs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05
View more
  7 in total

1.  Nickel-titanium shape memory alloy embracing fixator benefits the determination of the implantation angle of prosthesis stem in tumor-type artificial joint replacement.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Hongrui Wang; Hongyue Zhang; Wei Miao; Jilu Liu; Shuogui Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Takeshi Shoji; Takuma Yamasaki; Soutarou Izumi; Susumu Hachisuka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Survival and outcomes of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for primary and non-primary bone tumors: Single institutional results.

Authors:  Charles A Gusho; Bishir Clayton; Nabil Mehta; Matthew W Colman; Steven Gitelis; Alan T Blank
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-07

4.  "Purse-String" Capsular Closure for Decreasing Dislocation Rates in Proximal Femur Replacements.

Authors:  Thomas A Novack; Jay N Patel; Tyler Hoskins; Charles Long; Christopher Mazzei; David Goyette; James C Wittig
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-11-10

5.  Megaprosthesis Reconstruction of the Proximal Femur following Bone Tumour Resection: When Do We Need the Cup?

Authors:  Riccardo Zucchini; Andrea Sambri; Michele Fiore; Claudio Giannini; Davide Maria Donati; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2021-09-06

6.  Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of tantalum components in the management of acetabular reconstruction following periacetabular oncologic resection in primary malignancies.

Authors:  Pengfei Zan; Xiaojun Ma; Hongsheng Wang; Zhengdong Cai; Jiakang Shen; Wei Sun
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection.

Authors:  Christoph Theil; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Niklas Deventer; Sebastian Klingebiel; George Grammatopoulos; Friedrich Boettner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.