Literature DB >> 24658873

Customised osteotomy guides and endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumours.

Boris Michael Holzapfel, Hakan Pilge, Peter Michael Prodinger, Andreas Toepfer, Susanne Mayer-Wagner, Dietmar Werner Hutmacher, Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Maximilian Rudert, Reiner Gradinger, Hans Rechl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to analyse clinical and oncological outcomes of patients after guided resection of periacetabular tumours and endoprosthetic reconstruction of the remaining defect.
METHODS: From 1988 to 2008, we treated 56 consecutive patients (mean age 52.5 years, 41.1 % women). Patients were followed up either until death or February 2011 (mean follow up 5.5 years, range 0.1-22.5, standard deviation ± 5.3). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate survival rates.
RESULTS: Disease-specific survival was 59.9 % at five years and 49.7 % at ten and 20 years, respectively. Wide resection margins were achieved in 38 patients, whereas 11 patients underwent marginal and seven intralesional resection. Survival was significantly better in patients with wide or marginal resection than in patients with intralesional resection (p = 0.022). Survival for patients with secondary tumours was significantly worse than for patients with primary tumours (p = 0.003). In 29 patients (51.8 %), at least one reoperation was necessary, resulting in a revision-free survival of 50.5 % at five years, 41.1 % at ten years and 30.6 % at 20 years. Implant survival was 77.0 % at five years, 68.6 % at ten years and 51.8 % at 20 years. A total of 35 patients (62.5 %) experienced one or more complications after surgery. Ten of 56 patients (17.9 %) experienced local recurrence after a mean of 8.9 months. The mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 18.1 (60.1 %).
CONCLUSION: The surgical approach assessed in this study simplifies the process of tumour resection and prosthesis implantation and leads to acceptable clinical and oncological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24658873      PMCID: PMC4071499          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2314-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  31 in total

1.  Incidence and outcome after infection of megaprostheses.

Authors:  Hakan Pilge; Guntmar Gradl; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Hans Gollwitzer
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Constrained total hip megaprosthesis for primary periacetabular tumors.

Authors:  Takafumi Ueda; Shigeki Kakunaga; Satoshi Takenaka; Nobuhito Araki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The outcomes of navigation-assisted bone tumour surgery: minimum three-year follow-up.

Authors:  H S Cho; J H Oh; I Han; H-S Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-10

4.  Clinical effectiveness of hemipelvic reconstruction using computer-aided custom-made prostheses after resection of malignant pelvic tumors.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Jian Li; Quan Li; Guodong Li; Zhengdong Cai
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Computer-assisted resection and reconstruction of pelvic tumor sarcoma.

Authors:  Pierre-Louis Docquier; Laurent Paul; Olivier Cartiaux; Christian Delloye; Xavier Banse
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2010-11-28

6.  Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Dasen Li; Xiaodong Tang; Yi Yang; Tao Ji
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions.

Authors:  Ke-Rong Dai; Meng-Ning Yan; Zhen-An Zhu; Yue-Hua Sun
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Internal hemipelvectomy and reconstruction with a megaprosthesis.

Authors:  P E Müller; H R Dürr; B Wegener; C Pellengahr; H J Refior; V Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Functional results and quality of life after treatment of pelvic sarcomas involving the acetabulum.

Authors:  C Hoffmann; G Gosheger; C Gebert; H Jürgens; W Winkelmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Can bone tissue engineering contribute to therapy concepts after resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma?

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Mohit Prashant Chhaya; Ferry Petrus Wilhelmus Melchels; Nina Pauline Holzapfel; Peter Michael Prodinger; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Martijn van Griensven; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Maximilian Rudert; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-01-14
View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Eric Alexander Lewallen; Scott M Riester; Carolina A Bonin; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Amel Dudakovic; Sanjeev Kakar; Robert C Cohen; Jennifer J Westendorf; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  CORR Insights®: Reconstruction After Hemipelvectomy With the Ice-Cream Cone Prosthesis: What Are the Short-term Clinical Results?

Authors:  Luis Aponte-Tinao
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Scaffold-based Bone Tissue Engineering].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; M Rudert; D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Photopolymerizable Biomaterials and Light-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Claire Yu; Jacob Schimelman; Pengrui Wang; Kathleen L Miller; Xuanyi Ma; Shangting You; Jiaao Guan; Bingjie Sun; Wei Zhu; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Jig-assisted modified Harrington reconstruction for metastatic bone destruction of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Raja Bhaskara Rajasekaran; Muhammad Ather Siddiqi; Duncan Whitwell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers.

Authors:  Mufaddal Kazi; Vivek Sukumar; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  New adjustable modular hemipelvic prosthesis replacement with 3D-print osteotomy guide plate used in periacetabular malignant tumors: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Jun Li; Zicheng Liu; Dan Peng; Xia Chen; Chao Yu; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  What are the Complications of Three-dimensionally Printed, Custom-made, Integrative Hemipelvic Endoprostheses in Patients with Primary Malignancies Involving the Acetabulum, and What is the Function of These Patients?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Li Min; Minxun Lu; Yuqi Zhang; Yitian Wang; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou; Hong Duan; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 9.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  3D-printed guiding templates for improved osteosarcoma resection.

Authors:  Limin Ma; Ye Zhou; Ye Zhu; Zefeng Lin; Yingjun Wang; Yu Zhang; Hong Xia; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.