Literature DB >> 22740154

Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.

Wolfgang Luxenberger1, T Lahousen, C Walch.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate noise levels generated during micro-suction aural toilet using an anatomic silicon ear model. It is an experimental study. In an anatomic ear model made of silicone, the eardrum was replaced by a 1-cm diameter microphone of a calibrated sound-level measuring device. Ear wax was removed using the sucker of a standard ENT treatment unit (Atmos Servant 5(®)). Mean and peak sound levels during the suction procedure were recorded with suckers of various diameters (Fergusson-Frazier 2.7-4 mm as well as Rosen 1.4-2.5 mm). Average noise levels during normal suction in a distance of 1 cm in front of the eardrum ranged between 97 and 103.5 dB(A) (broadband noise). Peak noise levels reached 118 dB(A). During partial obstruction of the sucker by cerumen or dermal flakes, peak noise levels reached 146 dB(A). Peak noise levels observed during the so-called clarinet phenomena were independent of the diameter or type of suckers used. Although micro-suction aural toilet is regarded as an established, widespread and usually safe method to clean the external auditory canal, some caution seems advisable. The performance of long-lasting suction periods straight in front of the eardrum without sound-protecting earwax between sucker and eardrum should be avoided. In particular, when clarinet phenomena are occurring (as described above), the suction procedure should be aborted immediately. In the presence of dermal flakes blocking the auditory canal, cleaning with micro-forceps or other non-suctioning instruments might represent a reasonable alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22740154     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2090-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Acute hearing impairment by extremely high sound pressure levels].

Authors:  M Liedtke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Suction-generated noise levels during aural toilet].

Authors:  S Hansen; A Stupp; S Schwarze; J Schipper
Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 1.057

3.  Suction-generated noise in the external meatus and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D Katzke; G Sesterhenn
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Suction tube noise and myringotomy.

Authors:  M G Spencer
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.

Authors:  J D Snelling; A Smithard; A Waddell
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Acoustical factors of noise created by suctioning middle ear fluid.

Authors:  R F Wetmore; W J Henry; D F Konkle
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-07

7.  Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery.

Authors:  J L Parkin; G S Wood; R D Wood; G A McCandless
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-02

8.  Raised ABR threshold after suction aspiration of glue from the middle ear: three case studies.

Authors:  J D Mason; S M Mason; K P Gibbin
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.469

  8 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  [The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].

Authors:  David Bächinger; Raphael Jecker; Jean-Christoph Hannig; Andreas Werner; Horst Hildebrandt; Michael Eidenbenz; Martin Kompis; Tobias Kleinjung; Dorothe Veraguth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 1.330

2.  Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum.

Authors:  Allen Young; Nathaniel H Reeve; Albert Yang; Jacob Kahane; Chad Cross; Anita Albanese; Matthew Ng
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  In vitro efficacy of a consumer-marketed ear cleaning tool.

Authors:  Glenn Todd Schneider; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.