Literature DB >> 7352914

Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery.

J L Parkin, G S Wood, R D Wood, G A McCandless.   

Abstract

The air-conduction noise levels in the external and middle ear generated by drilling and suction during temporal bone surgery were measured. Variables included diamond burrs, cutting burrs, two different air drills (Hall and Stryker) an electric drill (Emesco), and drilling with and without suction irrigation. The results show that the single factor contributing the highest noise level is suction irrigation, which exposes the ipsilateral ear to noise levels averaging up to 107 dB (A). The average noise levels of drilling range from 65 to 96 dB (A) varying with the drill and burr used. Simultaneous drilling and suction irrigation generated noise levels ranging from 91 to 108 dB (A). Cutting burrs were found to be up to 9 dB (A) more intense than diamond burrs. Exposure to these noise levels may account for shifts in the hearing thresholds sometimes apparent in postoperative audiograms of mastoid surgery patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7352914     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1980.00790260024008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0003-9977


  11 in total

1.  Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luxenberger; T Lahousen; C Walch
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss after drill-generated acoustic trauma in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  J Doménech; M Carulla; J Traserra
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1989

3.  Drill-induced Cochlear Injury During Otologic Surgery: Intracochlear Pressure Evidence of Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Nyssa F Farrell; Samuel P Gubbels; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Microsuction aural toilet in ENT outpatients: a questionnaire to evaluate the patient experience.

Authors:  J Addams-Williams; A Howarth; J J Phillipps
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Investigation of noise levels generated by otologic drills.

Authors:  Carsten V Dalchow; K C Hagemeier; A Muenscher; R Knecht; F Kameier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Post operative sensorineural hearing loss after middle ear surgery.

Authors:  A A Desai; R G Aiyer; V K Pandya; Unnikrishnan Nair
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-07

7.  Ondansetron and dexamethasone in middle ear procedures.

Authors:  Hammad Usmani; A Quadir; Rehan Asif Siddiqui; S C Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04

8.  Evaluation of Inner Ear Damage by Using Otoacoustic Emissions in Patients Who Underwent Mastoidectomy and Tympanoplasty Operations in the Early Period.

Authors:  Kadir Özdamar; Hasan Emre Koçak; Salih Aydın; Ümit Taşkın; Kadir Yücebaş; Mehmet Faruk Oktay
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01

9.  Effect of isoflurane on the hearing in mice.

Authors:  Joung Uk Kim; Yun Suk Ahn; Jin Kyung Suh; Jong Woo Chung
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2012-04-30

10.  Day-case management of chronic suppurative otitis media with cholesteatoma with canal wall down technique surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Ralli; Giuseppe Nola; Alberto Taglioni; Michele Grasso; Massimo Ralli
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2017-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.