Literature DB >> 22218937

[Suction-generated noise levels during aural toilet].

S Hansen1, A Stupp, S Schwarze, J Schipper.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of suction for the removal of foreign bodies or cerumen from the external auditory canal is a common procedure in ENT outpatient centers. Patients' lamentations about high noise levels during microsuction can cause assault charges concerning permanent hearing loss or tinnitus. However, the medical opinion of these cases is difficult because only a small amount of objective data about suction-generated noise is available.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, noise levels of different suction devices were measured under standardized conditions in an artificial model head (HEAD acoustics, Germany). In a second set-up water and lard (instead of cerumen) were suctioned from an artificial external auditory canal, which was coupled with a noise mediator (Mediator 2238, Brüel & Kjaer, Denmark).
RESULTS: There was a significant influence of the inner diameter of the sucker on the noise level. A sucker with a diameter of 1.4 mm generated a noise level of more than 100 dB(A). The suctioning of water generated a maximum noise level of more than 130 dB(LAmax), while the suctioning of lard reached nearly 150 dB(LAmax). The time lapse of both noise and frequency level for lard suctioning was characteristic of a bang.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates objective and reproducible data for suction-generated noise levels and could help to evaluate patients' complaints. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22218937     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1295464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  3 in total

1.  Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luxenberger; T Lahousen; C Walch
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum.

Authors:  Allen Young; Nathaniel H Reeve; Albert Yang; Jacob Kahane; Chad Cross; Anita Albanese; Matthew Ng
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.