Literature DB >> 19260881

Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.

J D Snelling1, A Smithard, A Waddell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the noise generated during suction aural toilet and to determine whether there is any clinically measureable effect on audiometric thresholds. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study with 14 patients.
SETTING: The study was conducted in an aural toilet clinic in a district general ENT department. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen patients who attend regularly for suction aural toilet to clear cerumen. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Live direct measurement of noise levels during treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment pure tone audiometry.
RESULTS: Microsuction generated a broadband sound with a peak at 2 kHz. Sound levels peaked at over 120 dB(A) in two patients. We found no evidence of any shift in audiometric thresholds following microsuction aural toilet.
CONCLUSIONS: Microsuction is a noisy procedure that is uncomfortable for some patients. However, it does not appear to be sufficiently noisy to produce a clinically detectable threshold shift. We would suggest that it is safe but that the use of non-suction methods or a fine end may on occasion be preferable to improve patient comfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19260881     DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1749-4478            Impact factor:   2.597


  4 in total

1.  Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.

Authors:  Wolfgang Luxenberger; T Lahousen; C Walch
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum.

Authors:  Allen Young; Nathaniel H Reeve; Albert Yang; Jacob Kahane; Chad Cross; Anita Albanese; Matthew Ng
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal.

Authors:  Colin Byrd; Eytan Keidar; Olga Santiago; Carl Shermetaro
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.

Authors:  M G Friedrich; T Tirilomis; J M Kollmeier; Y Wang; G G Hanekop
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-11-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.